Prediction of Tommy Czaplinski vs Santiago Padilla Cote Head-to-Head, At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
1 - 0
51% (22-21)
Career Total W/L
38% (5-8)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Czaplinski VS Cote H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 4-6 10-6 | |||||
Czaplinski VS Cote H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tommy Czaplinski | Santiago Padilla Cote |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tommy Czaplinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Diogo Marques
Player
Tommy Czaplinski
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
38%
(
13 of
34)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Czaplinski
Player
Ander Tarrio Ponte
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Santiago Padilla Cote Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommy Czaplinski | Santiago Padilla Cote |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 51% (22/21) | 38% (5/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (49/46) | 41% (11/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (450/455) | 48% (104/113) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 52% (16/15) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.23 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 100 | 3 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 | 0.22 |
| Total Double Faults | 83 | 23 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 35.84 | 131.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (843/1449) | 64% (167/262) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (575/843) | 57% (95/167) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (290/606) | 37% (35/95) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (59/122) | 41% (7/17) |
| Return Points Win % | 40% (576/1434) | 31% (80/254) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 51% (22/21) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (22/42) | 38% (5/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (22/19) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (22/3) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (21/3) | 0% (8/0) |
See recent tennis photos of Czaplinski and Cote
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
