Tommaso Compagnucci vs Pierluigi Basile Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Aug at 01:43 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Compagnucci vs P. Basile

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Compagnucci 1 - 0 Basile
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tommaso Compagnucci winning 2 and Pierluigi Basile winning 0. The last match between Tommaso Compagnucci and Pierluigi Basile was at the Como Challenger, 24-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Tommaso Compagnucci getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Compagnucci | 1 |
| Basile | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Como Challenger(08-24-25)
T. Compagnucci vs P. Basile H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.50% (161-119) | Career Total W/L | 54.76% (23-19) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Compagnucci vs P. Basile Match Preview:
- Basile's second serve performance is slightly stronger, with a 44.74% success rate compared to Compagnucci's 41.75%. Could this give Basile an edge?
- On return games, Compagnucci has a slight advantage, winning 44.29% of points on receiving second serves, versus Basile’s 43.31%.
- Compagnucci excels at returning first serves, capturing 31.3% compared to Basile's 26.5%. This could be pivotal in game outcomes.
- Under pressure, Basile saves 56.7% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Compagnucci’s 52.22% in clutch moments.
- Compagnucci’s overall match win rate in the past year stands at 62.9%, superior to Basile's 56% win rate.
- When considering surface preferences, Compagnucci is strongest on clay with a 60% win rate, whereas Basile prefers hard courts at 67%.
- In the last year, Basile has a higher win percentage (69.23%) at the $10K level compared to Compagnucci's 67.86%.
- Compagnucci has faced tougher competition based on opponent rank, averaging 375.77 against Basile's 413.36 ranked opponents.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Compagnucci is more reliable, winning 61% of such scenarios compared to Basile's 50% success rate.
- Compagnucci demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion, excelling with 44.44% conversion against Basile’s 31.58%.
Editorial Prediction (August 24, 2025, UTC):
Examining the recent performance of both players, Basile exhibits a modest advantage in second serve success and break point saving. These skills can be crucial under high-tension moments in the match.
However, Compagnucci's strong return game and proficiency on clay surfaces could neutralize Basile's strength on hard courts. His superior conversion rate on breakpoints and a higher win percentage against tougher opponents suggest a competitive edge.
Furthermore, Compagnucci's tendency to perform well in deciding sets enhances his likelihood of clinching tight matches. Consequently, the data sways towards Compagnucci as the favored candidate to triumph in the upcoming match.
Tommaso Compagnucci vs Pierluigi Basile Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Compagnucci vs P. Basile H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:37:57 | Average Match Time | 1:37:57 |
| 67% (40/60) | 1st Serve % | 63% (43/68) |
| 60% (24/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 75% (15/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (13/25) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 46% (31/68) | Return Points Win % | 35% (21/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Compagnucci Recent Matches Played
P. Basile Recent Matches Played

T. Compagnucci vs P. Basile Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.50% (161/119) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.76% (23/19) |
| 55.19% (351/285) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.10% (54/44) |
| 51.92% (3089/2861) | Games Win/Loss | 50.47% (484/475) |
| 35.71% (10/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 60.34% (143/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.84% (17/14) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 553 | Aces Total | 137 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 478 | Total Double Faults | 140 |
| 1:38:32 | Average Match Time | 1:55:3 |
| 426.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 361 |
| 61% (10666/17402) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1834/3144) |
| 64% (6816/10666) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1222/1834) |
| 51% (3411/6736) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (635/1310) |
| 47% (879/1869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (118/303) |
| 43% (7273/17091) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1160/2999) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 28.57% (10/25) | Challenger W/L | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 61.63% (151/94) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (15/9) |
| 57% (158/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (33/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (10/16) |
| 61% (46/76) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 91% (152/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (24/20) |
| 9% (152/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (24/4) |
| 18% (128/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (18/3) |