Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tommaso Compagnucci vs Congsup Congcar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Compagnucci vs Congcar analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommaso Compagnucci vs Congsup Congcar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Compagnucci has won 49.54% of points on his second serve, while Congcar has won 52.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Compagnucci, in recent form, has won 50.96% of his opponent's second serve points, while Congcar has won 51.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.64% and 32.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Compagnucci has saved 55.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Congcar has saved 57.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Compagnucci has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Congcar winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Compagnucci has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Congcar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 119/ 156), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Compagnucci has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.45% of matches (W/L 35/ 27), where as Congcar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 15/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Compagnucci winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Compagnucci winning 2 and Congcar winning 1. The last match between Compagnucci and Congcar was at the M25 Tay Ninh, 29-09-2022, Second, Hard with Tommaso Compagnucci getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Compagnucci and Congcar have played a deciding set 1 times, with Compagnucci winning 1 times and Congcar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Compagnucci winning 0, and Congcar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Compagnucci has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.26 while Congcar has played against players with an average rank of 42.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Compagnucci has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Congcar has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Compagnucci has converted 49.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Congcar has converted 44.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Compagnucci 1 - 0 Congcar
508
Rank
508
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
53% (92-81)
Career Total W/L
43% (120-159)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Compagnucci VS Congcar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tommaso Compagnucci | Congsup Congcar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (43/75) | 49% (43/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (30/43) | 56% (24/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (19/32) | 55% (24/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (39/87) | 35% (26/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Compagnucci VS Congcar H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Congsup Congcar
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommaso Compagnucci | Congsup Congcar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) | 20% (2/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (209/213) | 39% (37/58) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:6 | 1:22:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.75 | 83 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (829/1314) | 66% (188/287) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (492/829) | 60% (112/188) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (249/485) | 51% (50/99) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (62/123) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (558/1326) | 29% (82/278) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (11/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Tommaso Compagnucci Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Yshai Oliel
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
75 of
100)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Max Houkes
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Denis Constantin Spiridon
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Mateo Martinovic
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Lorenzo Vatteroni
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
48 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Michnev
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Congsup Congcar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Congsup Congcar
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Brosset
Player
Congsup Congcar
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maik Steiner
Player
Congsup Congcar
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
5 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yunseong Chung
Player
Congsup Congcar
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Congsup Congcar
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Cade Birrell
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Dharmil Shah
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Congsup Congcar
Player
Ivan Panin
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pengyu Lu
Player
Congsup Congcar
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Compagnucci Vs Congcar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
