Tomasz Berkieta vs Massimo Pizzigoni Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the second serve performance over the past six months, Berkieta holds a significant advantage, winning 45.09% of points compared to Pizzigoni's 33.33%.
• Who excels in return games? While Berkieta has won 44.15% of opponents' second serve points, Pizzigoni slightly edges out with 46.09%. However, Pizzigoni clearly leads in returning first serves, winning 31.17% to Berkieta's 24.44%.
• Under pressure, Berkieta has saved 53.18% of breakpoints, outperforming Pizzigoni, who manages 49.18%.
• Why is match performance over the past year notable? Berkieta wins 56.14% of matches (32/25), slightly better than Pizzigoni's 51.28% (20/19).
• Surface preferences show contrasting strengths—Berkieta performs best on clay with a 51% win rate, whereas Pizzigoni thrives on hard surfaces, winning 63%
• Both players mostly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Berkieta winning 60.38% of matches versus Pizzigoni's 52.63%.
• Pizzigoni has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 161.26, compared to Berkieta who has battled players with an average rank of 350.02.
• In deciding sets, Pizzigoni excels with a 71% win rate, notably higher than Berkieta's 50%.
• Current event performance can reveal which player is in form, so be sure to consider their latest outings.
• Focusing on break point conversion, Pizzigoni is more effective, converting 38.46% of opportunities compared to Berkieta's 28.93%.

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

When delving into the detailed statistics of Berkieta and Pizzigoni, several key patterns emerge that illuminate their comparative strengths and weaknesses.

Berkieta holds a distinct advantage on second serve performance, which often correlates with match success. Despite this edge, Pizzigoni shows promise in first serve returns, a factor that could tip the scales during crucial points.

Historically, Berkieta demonstrates resilience under pressure, managing to fend off more breakpoints than Pizzigoni. Nonetheless, Pizzigoni's superior deciding set performance and break point conversion rate speak to her ability to capitalize during critical stages of a match.

Surface preferences suggest Berkieta may thrive on clay, but Pizzigoni's strength on hard courts and experience against higher-ranked opponents may provide an edge in diverse conditions.

Given these insights, while both players are formidable, Pizzigoni appears slightly favored to win based on her recent effectiveness in crucial areas such as first serve returns and deciding sets.