T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
R. B. Agut
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L W W LForm
L W L L W W W L L LThey have played 6 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 6 and Sachko winning 0. The last match between Etcheverry and Sachko was at the Turin Challenger, 15-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-6(8).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 3 |
Vitaliy Sachko | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Turin Challenger(15-05-2025)
Etcheverry | Stats | Sachko |
---|---|---|
44% (16-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (31-18) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
53 | Ranking | 213 |
27 | Highest Rank | 156 |
25 | Age | 27 |
R | Plays | R |
8 | Titles | 3 |
62% (361-224) | Career Total W/L | 58% (356-257) |
$2,990,920 | Career Prize Money | $163,030 |
3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
24 Jun 2025 / First
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(2) 7-6(8) |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
7-5 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
39 | Games Won | 27 |
23 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
2:3:17 | Average Match Time | 2:3:17 |
71% (152/213) | 1st Serve % | 63% (148/234) |
73% (111/152) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (89/148) |
54% (33/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (45/86) |
43% (9/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (4/15) |
43% (100/234) | Return Points Win % | 32% (69/213) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The potential winner of this matchup seems to be Etcheverry, based on a variety of key performance factors. Etcheverry has shown superior second serve efficiency and breakpoint saving capabilities, which are crucial in maintaining pressure on opponents.
Sachko offers strong competition with better overall match win rates and a higher conversion of break points. Yet, Etcheverry's ability to perform under pressure and superior head-to-head record poses a significant challenge for Sachko.
Additionally, Etcheverry's experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests better preparation for competitive matches. Although Sachko might have the edge if the match extends into a deciding set, Etcheverry's strengths in other areas appear more comprehensive.
Based on these considerations, Etcheverry is the likely candidate to secure victory in this impending match-up.
Etcheverry vs Sachko Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Karen Khachanov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Andrey Rublev
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
61 of
123)
12
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
123)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Otto Virtanen
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
75 of
103)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Jiri Lehecka
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Bondioli
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Dellien
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Milos Karol
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Jakub Mensik
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
3
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (361/224) | Win/Loss | 58% (356/257) |
59% (827/575) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (792/619) |
54% (7180/6159) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6996/6159) |
48% (43/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (57/43) |
65% (301/159) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (217/153) |
57% (12/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (82/58) |
33% (5/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
2357 | Aces Total | 1313 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
862 | Total Double Faults | 1351 |
1:53:28 | Average Match Time | 1:20:8 |
360.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.13 |
67% (26376/39167) | 1st Serve % | 63% (20612/32876) |
69% (18272/26376) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (13732/20612) |
51% (6564/12791) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5817/12264) |
42% (1720/4107) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1645/3607) |
40% (16246/40360) | Return Points Win % | 42% (14147/33393) |
54% (20/17) | Slam W/L | 22% (2/7) |
36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
50% (59/58) | Main Tour W/L | 39% (11/17) |
67% (129/63) | Challenger W/L | 56% (156/121) |
69% (136/62) | Futures W/L | 63% (186/109) |
62% (340/546) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (349/593) |
52% (17/33) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
50% (100/199) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/159) |
54% (104/191) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (114/198) |
84% (359/300) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (326/287) |
16% (359/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (326/39) |
25% (225/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (287/68) |