T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
S. Tsitsipas
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L W W W LForm
W L W L W W W L L LThey have played 6 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 4 and Medjedovic winning 2. The last match between Etcheverry and Medjedovic was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 24-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 6-4 6-7(4) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 2 |
Hamad Medjedovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(24-04-2025)
Etcheverry | Stats | Medjedovic |
---|---|---|
45% (14-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
55 | Ranking | 77 |
27 | Highest Rank | 61 |
25 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
8 | Titles | 9 |
62% (359-221) | Career Total W/L | 64% (162-92) |
$2,990,920 | Career Prize Money | $764,910 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
5-7 6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
95)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 2 |
35 | Games Won | 26 |
14 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
2:47:37 | Average Match Time | 2:47:37 |
65% (140/214) | 1st Serve % | 54% (110/204) |
71% (100/140) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (74/110) |
51% (38/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (47/94) |
40% (8/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 12% (3/25) |
41% (83/204) | Return Points Win % | 36% (76/214) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Over the past year, Medjedovic has demonstrated impressive form, winning 67.12% of his matches, translating to a win-loss record of 49-24. In contrast, Etcheverry has secured victories in 47.62% of his matches, standing with a win-loss tally of 30-33. While both players excel on clay, Medjedovic boasts a 68% win rate (83-39), compared to Etcheverry's 66% (296-154). Medjedovic struggles on hard courts (59% win rate), and Etcheverry finds grass challenging (27% win rate). These performance metrics contribute significantly to the head-to-head analysis, particularly given the differing levels of competition they face. Medjedovic has been successful at the Challenger/ITF level, winning 70.37% of matches whereas Etcheverry often plays on the main tour, clinching 42.86% of his matches.
In their direct encounters, Etcheverry has prevailed, winning the sole match between them, which extended to three sets, culminating in a 5-7, 6-2, 6-2 victory at the Aix-En-Provence Challenger on May 3, 2023. Their head-to-head matches average a duration of 2:19:4, and they exhibit equal records in extreme pressure situations, having played no tiebreaks against each other. Under pressure, Medjedovic has saved 55.02% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Etcheverry leads with a 58.42% success rate. These aspects play an essential role in live prediction and betting, particularly if the match progresses to high-pressure situations like deciding sets.
Regarding second serve performance, Etcheverry holds a slight edge, capturing 47.69% of points in the last six months, compared to Medjedovic’s 45.07%. In return games, Medjedovic wins 42.51% of opponents' second serve points whereas Etcheverry achieves a higher rate of 43.84%. When returning first serves, Medjedovic marginally leads with a 24.56% success rate versus Etcheverry's 24.44%. Medjedovic has also been more effective in converting breakpoints recently, at 28.03%, compared to Etcheverry's 21.97%, a critical statistic during in-game betting.
On the broader competitive stage, Medjedovic typically faces opponents with an average rank of 175.67, whereas Etcheverry competes against players averaging rank 87.22. If the match enters a deciding set, Medjedovic, with a win rate of 64% over the last year, appears more competent compared to Etcheverry’s 43%. Given these statistics, Medjedovic seems poised for success in the upcoming match, provided he maintains composure under pressure and capitalizes on breakpoint opportunities.
Etcheverry vs Medjedovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Jiri Lehecka
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Francisco Comesana
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
11
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Laslo Djere
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Otto Virtanen
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
79%
(
81 of
103)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (359/221) | Win/Loss | 64% (162/92) |
59% (823/567) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (357/233) |
54% (7121/6094) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3027/2577) |
48% (43/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
66% (301/158) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (83/41) |
57% (12/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (38/23) |
27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) |
0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
2322 | Aces Total | 1668 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
850 | Total Double Faults | 831 |
1:53:20 | Average Match Time | 1:37:38 |
359.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 309.47 |
67% (26128/38767) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10632/17087) |
69% (18102/26128) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7694/10632) |
51% (6489/12639) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3294/6455) |
42% (1707/4078) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (699/1641) |
40% (16104/39961) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6730/17220) |
56% (20/16) | Slam W/L | 67% (14/7) |
36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 53% (8/7) |
67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
50% (57/56) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (32/22) |
67% (129/63) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
69% (136/62) | Futures W/L | 70% (43/18) |
62% (338/542) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (152/239) |
53% (17/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
51% (99/196) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (51/103) |
54% (103/190) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (42/72) |
83% (357/298) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/142) |
16% (357/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/17) |
26% (222/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (94/19) |