Tomas Machac vs Reilly Opelka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W L W W
Form
W L W L L W L W W LHead To Head: Machac 2 - 0 Opelka
They have played 7 sets in total, with Machac winning 5 and Opelka winning 2. The last match between Machac and Opelka was at the Miami Open - Miami, 24-03-2025, Third, Hard with Tomas Machac getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tomas Machac | 2 |
| Reilly Opelka | 0 |
Miami Open - Miami(24-03-2025)
7
6
6
3
| Machac | Stats | Opelka |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (14-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (11-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 21 | Ranking | 114 |
| 20 | Highest Rank | 17 |
| 24 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 8 |
| 67% (272-137) | Career Total W/L | 56% (236-182) |
| $3,136,070 | Career Prize Money | $3,342,250 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Minaur VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
63%
(
105 of
167)
1st Serve %
66%
(
115 of
173)
16
Aces
40
7
Double Faults
16
84%
(
88 of
105)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
102 of
115)
58%
(
36 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
26%
(
43 of
167)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
47 of
173)
171
Total Points Won
169
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 42 | Games Won | 38 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 59 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 18 |
| 2:19:59 | Average Match Time | 2:19:59 |
| 64% (144/225) | 1st Serve % | 69% (159/232) |
| 85% (123/144) | 1st Serve Win % | 86% (136/159) |
| 60% (49/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (30/73) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (1/8) |
| 28% (66/232) | Return Points Win % | 24% (53/225) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tomas Machac vs Reilly Opelka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tomas Machac 2 - 0 Reilly Opelka
When examining the performance on second serves over the past six months, Machac has won 48.97% of points, slightly trailing Opelka, who has secured 49.44%. This is a crucial predictor of match outcomes. In terms of return game statistics, Machac has captured 45.69% of his opponents' second serve points, compared to Opelka's 40.77%. For first serve returns, Machac comes out ahead with 22.12%, while Opelka trails at 19.22%. These numbers are pivotal in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchups.
Analyzing their performances under pressure, Machac has been able to save 54.59% of breakpoints, while Opelka excels slightly better at 64.81%. This statistic is vital for in-game betting predictions. Over the last year, Machac has won 62.3% of his matches (W/L 38/23), while Opelka has secured victories in 54.29% of his games (W/L 19/16), giving us a comprehensive head-to-head prediction.
Looking at surface preferences, Machac exhibits his best career win percentage on Hard courts with a 69% (W/L 82/37) success rate but drops to 50% (W/L 6/6) on Grass. On the other hand, Opelka has his highest win percentage on Indoor Hard, winning 67% (W/L 46/23), but struggles on Grass with a 40% (W/L 10/15) record. In terms of player level, Machac has played most matches on the Main Tour, winning 68.97% (W/L 20/9) of his encounters, whereas Opelka has a win rate of 57.14% (W/L 12/9) on the Main Tour.
The direct head-to-head history favors Machac, who has won the only prior encounter with Opelka, securing victory in three out of five sets. This match took place at the Australian Open in Melbourne, with Machac emerging victorious with scores of 3-6, 7-6(1), 6-7(5), 7-6(4), 6-4. In past matches, their average match time has been 3:25:0. Notably, in deciding sets, Machac has been triumphant once, with Opelka failing to secure a win under such circumstances.
Looking deeper into high-pressure scenarios, they have engaged in three tie-breaks, with Machac clinching two and Opelka one. Opponent quality analysis over the last 12 months shows Machac facing opponents with an average rank of 59.2, while Opelka's opposition averaged a rank of 88.03. Additionally, Machac has a superior deciding set performance, winning 68% over the last year compared to Opelka's 63%. Based on the comprehensive analysis of these statistics, Machac holds a slight edge and is likely to prevail in the upcoming match against Opelka.
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Tomas Machac
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
41
|
4-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Daniel Altmaier
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jakub Mensik
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
9
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Tomas Machac
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Reilly Opelka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Holger Rune
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
21
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
15
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
93%
(
39 of
42)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Reilly Opelka
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
26
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Reilly Opelka
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reilly Opelka
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
14
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
12 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
17 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Reilly Opelka
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
3
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Cameron Norrie
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
18
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
52 of
66)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
29 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (272/137) | Win/Loss | 56% (236/182) |
| 64% (615/339) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (567/463) |
| 55% (4957/4039) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5503/5279) |
| 69% (83/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (111/95) |
| 64% (77/43) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (69/49) |
| 68% (106/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (46/23) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (10/15) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 1.12 |
| 1753 | Aces Total | 5923 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 780 | Total Double Faults | 1125 |
| 1:35:56 | Average Match Time | 1:25:37 |
| 330.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 386.36 |
| 62% (16978/27409) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17554/28046) |
| 71% (12031/16949) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (13894/17554) |
| 54% (5662/10457) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (5721/10492) |
| 43% (1240/2869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (492/1520) |
| 40% (11398/28341) | Return Points Win % | 29% (7969/27061) |
| 66% (31/16) | Slam W/L | 48% (24/26) |
| 57% (16/12) | Masters W/L | 54% (33/28) |
| 73% (8/3) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 65% (45/24) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (67/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (116/56) | Challenger W/L | 64% (62/35) |
| 69% (54/24) | Futures W/L | 61% (46/29) |
| 70% (255/364) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (220/379) |
| 52% (14/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (15/34) |
| 59% (88/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (173/323) |
| 54% (62/114) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (81/150) |
| 88% (273/241) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (220/181) |
| 10% (273/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (220/39) |
| 22% (135/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (198/55) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tomas Machac
View full predicted draw for Machac in Miami
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
