Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Machac vs Evan Furness Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Machac vs Furness analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Machac vs Evan Furness Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Machac has won 53.62% of points on his second serve, while Furness has won 45.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Machac, in recent form, has won 49.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Furness has won 51.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.62% and 37.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Machac has saved 65.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Furness has saved 53.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Machac has won 67.57% of matches played (W/L 50/ 24), with Furness winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Machac has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 84/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4). Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Machac has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.75% of matches (W/L 22/ 10), where as Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Machac winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Machac winning 3 and Furness winning 3. The last match between Machac and Furness was at the Prague 1 Challenger, 20-04-2022, Second, Clay with Tomas Machac getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Machac and Furness have played a deciding set 2 times, with Machac winning 1 times and Furness 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Machac winning 1, and Furness 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Machac has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.73 while Furness has played against players with an average rank of 200.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Machac has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Furness has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Machac has converted 42.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Furness has converted 49.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Machac 1 - 1 Furness
50
Rank
43
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
823
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
67% (235-115)
Career Total W/L
59% (287-199)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$1,161,000
Career Prize Money
$5,730
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Machac | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 30 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:25 | 2:11:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (111/181) | 62% (124/201) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (70/111) | 62% (77/124) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (32/70) | 43% (33/77) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 59% (10/17) | 45% (9/20) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (91/201) | 44% (79/181) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Evan Furness
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| 1-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tomas Machac
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Machac | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (35/19) | 53% (24/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (294/252) | 50% (211/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:23 | 1:37:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.91 | 218.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1068/1673) | 60% (855/1415) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (790/1068) | 63% (541/855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (317/605) | 46% (257/560) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/155) | 49% (75/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (641/1713) | 43% (589/1364) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (13/19) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (9/0) |
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Juncheng Shang
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tomas Machac
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Andy Murray
59%
(
77 of
130)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
110)
6
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
51%
(
27 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
35%
(
45 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
110)
123
Total Points Won
117
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Andrey Rublev
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Darwin Blanch
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Tomas Machac
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Stan Wawrinka
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Machac
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Nikola Milojevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Machac Vs Furness Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tomas Machac
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Evan Furness
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
