Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Farjat vs Berk Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Farjat vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Farjat vs Berk Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Farjat has won 46.11% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 44.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Farjat, in recent form, has won 50.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 55.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.09% and 39.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Farjat has saved 59.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 53.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Farjat has won 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/ 31), with Ilkel winning 51.06% (W/L 24/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Farjat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 30/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 125/ 94). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 21/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 63/ 79).
- Player level: In the last year, Farjat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 24/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Farjat winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Farjat winning 2 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Farjat and Ilkel was at the M15 Monastir, 19-05-2021, First, Hard with Berk Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Farjat and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Farjat winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Farjat winning 0, and Ilkel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Farjat has played against opponents with an average rank of 133.74 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 76.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Farjat has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Farjat has converted 45.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 48.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Farjat 1 - 1 Ilkel
612
Rank
554
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
58% (155-112)
Career Total W/L
44% (84-105)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Farjat | Berk Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:51:0 | 0:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (47/76) | 56% (41/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (36/47) | 76% (31/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (12/29) | 56% (18/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (24/73) | 37% (28/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Berk Ilkel
Player
Tomas Farjat
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Farjat | Berk Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (19/18) | 58% (26/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (176/168) | 55% (215/173) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 63% (12/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 54 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 15.41 | 70.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (504/927) | 67% (505/754) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (333/504) | 60% (304/505) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (183/423) | 45% (113/249) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (48/100) | 49% (42/86) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (394/908) | 44% (333/749) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (8/7) | 57% (12/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Tomas Farjat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Tomas Farjat
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
1
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Tomas Farjat
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bautista Vilicich
Player
Tomas Farjat
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Farjat
Player
Joel Angel Lucero
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Tomas Farjat
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Farjat
Player
Sean Hess
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Farjat
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Farjat
Player
Nicolas Parizzia
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago De La Fuente
Player
Tomas Farjat
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Berk Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Louroi Martinez
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dinko Dinev
Player
Berk Ilkel
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hien Pham
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Drazen Petrovic
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Berk Ilkel
Player
Farzan Amiri
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Farjat Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
