Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kocevar-Desman vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kocevar-Desman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 50.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kocevar-Desman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 46% (W/L 23/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kocevar-Desman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 98/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kocevar-Desman winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kocevar-Desman winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Kocevar-Desman and Zandschulp was at the Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam), 25-08-2017, Quarterfinals, Clay with Tom Kocevar-Desman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kocevar-Desman and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kocevar-Desman winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kocevar-Desman winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kocevar-Desman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 154.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kocevar-Desman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kocevar-Desman 1 - 0 Zandschulp
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
890
Rank
349
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
55% (239-197)
Career Total W/L
63% (326-192)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$675
Career Prize Money
$2,830,210
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kocevar-Desman VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (24/42) | 63% (25/40) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 40% (10/25) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 27% (4/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 65% (26/40) | 33% (14/42) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kocevar-Desman VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-0 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 35% (6/11) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (13/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (167/205) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
Aces Total | 0 | 84 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 0 | 48 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 173.65 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (726/1146) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (498/726) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (200/420) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (32/88) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (406/1136) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Tom Kocevar-Desman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
David Poljak
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
92%
(
44 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Simonas Zukauskas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hanwen Li
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Digvijaypratap Singh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oscar Moraing
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Alexis Canter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zsombor Velcz
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Savva Polukhin
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more