Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kocevar-Desman vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Tom Kocevar-Desman vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 49.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kocevar-Desman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 50.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kocevar-Desman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 46% (W/L 23/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kocevar-Desman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 98/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kocevar-Desman winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kocevar-Desman winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Kocevar-Desman and Zandschulp was at the Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam), 25-08-2017, Quarterfinals, Clay with Tom Kocevar-Desman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kocevar-Desman and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kocevar-Desman winning 0 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kocevar-Desman winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kocevar-Desman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 154.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kocevar-Desman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kocevar-Desman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kocevar-Desman 1 - 0 Zandschulp
890
Rank
349
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
55% (239-197)
Career Total W/L
63% (326-192)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$675
Career Prize Money
$2,830,210
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kocevar-Desman VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:57:0 | 0:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (24/42) | 63% (25/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (17/24) | 40% (10/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 27% (4/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 65% (26/40) | 33% (14/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kocevar-Desman VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tom Kocevar-Desman | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (13/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (167/205) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 84 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 173.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (726/1146) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (498/726) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (200/420) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 36% (32/88) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (406/1136) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Tom Kocevar-Desman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
13
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
92%
(
44 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Simonas Zukauskas
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanwen Li
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Digvijaypratap Singh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
30 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oscar Moraing
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Alexis Canter
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Zsombor Velcz
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Savva Polukhin
Player
Tom Kocevar-Desman
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kocevar-Desman Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
