Tom Fawcett vs Gokberk Ergeneman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fawcett vs Ergeneman analysis and find out who is favored!
Tom Fawcett vs Gokberk Ergeneman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fawcett has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ergeneman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fawcett, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ergeneman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fawcett has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ergeneman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fawcett has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ergeneman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fawcett has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 12/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 7/ 9). Ergeneman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 42/ 59), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fawcett winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fawcett winning 2 and Ergeneman winning 0. The last match between Fawcett and Ergeneman was at the M15 Antalya, 17-01-2019, First, Clay with Tom Fawcett getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fawcett and Ergeneman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fawcett winning 0 times and Ergeneman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fawcett winning 0, and Ergeneman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fawcett has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ergeneman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fawcett has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ergeneman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fawcett has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ergeneman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fawcett 1 - 0 Ergeneman
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
440
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (86-69)
Career Total W/L
38% (67-111)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tom Fawcett | Gokberk Ergeneman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (47/69) | 74% (52/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 55% (26/47) | 50% (26/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (10/22) | 28% (5/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Points W% | 56% (39/70) | 48% (33/69) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Tom Fawcett
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tom Fawcett | Gokberk Ergeneman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tom Fawcett Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Adam Walton
Player
Tom Fawcett
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Fawcett
Player
Kareem Allaf
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
76
Total Points Won
87
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Fawcett
Player
Drew Baird
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Felix Corwin
Player
Tom Fawcett
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Tom Fawcett
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tom Fawcett
Player
Reese Stalder
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Fawcett
Player
Daniel Fainblum
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henry Craig
Player
Tom Fawcett
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
15 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Tom Fawcett
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karue Sell
Player
Tom Fawcett
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Gokberk Ergeneman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 2-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more