Tiphanie Lemaitre vs Eliska Tichackova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W L W W L W L L
Form
W W W W W W W W W WHead-to-head: Lemaitre 0 - 1 Tichackova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lemaitre winning 1 and Tichackova winning 2. The last match between Lemaitre and Tichackova was at the W15 Monastir, 16-02-2025, Final, Hard with Eliska Tichackova getting the victory 2-6 6-3 7-5.
W15 Monastir(16-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Lemaitre VS Tichackova H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-3 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
Lemaitre VS Tichackova H2H Stats
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tiphanie Lemaitre vs Eliska Tichackova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tiphanie Lemaitre 0 - 1 Eliska Tichackova
Predictions focus on upcoming tennis match:
Examining the recent performances of both players sheds light on their current form and provides valuable insights for predicting the outcome of the forthcoming tennis match.
Second serve performance and its correlation to match prediction accuracy:
An analysis of their second serve performance in the last six months reveals intriguing figures. Lemaitre has displayed commendable prowess, clinching victory in 48.18% of the points, while Tichackova has similarly excelled, triumphing in 48.92% of these crucial points. It is noteworthy that a high correlation exists between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game stats and their significance in determining the favorite:
When considering return game stats, Lemaitre's recent form proves impressive. They have proven themselves by winning an impressive 55.25% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Tichackova's return game performance is equally noteworthy, seizing victory in 56.67% of these vital points. Moreover, when scrutinizing first serve returns, Lemaitre's success rate stands at 41.41%, while Tichackova has shown remarkable proficiency with a success rate of 46.79%. It is crucial to acknowledge that this statistic plays a pivotal role in determining the favored player in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Analyzing performance under pressure:
When the heat is on, Lemaitre has demonstrated an admirable ability to save breakpoints, preserving their composure and saving 52.63% of these crucial moments. Similarly, Tichackova has showcased their resilience by saving 59.83% of the breakpoints. Such statistics prove invaluable to those engaging in in-game betting predictions, aiding them in making informed choices.
Performance overview and head-to-head prediction:
Looking at the past year, Lemaitre's track record indicates victories in 44.26% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 27 wins and 34 defeats. Conversely, Tichackova has had an even more impressive run, clinching triumphs in 75% of matches played, with only 5 losses out of 20 matches. Considering these performances, an overall head-to-head prediction emerges.
Impact of playing surfaces on players' success rates:
Notably, Lemaitre thrives on hard surfaces, boasting a remarkable win percentage of 55% on this terrain. However, their performance on indoor hard surfaces hasn't been as exceptional, as they have managed to secure victories in only 47% of matches played. In contrast, Tichackova has consistently dominated on hard surfaces, demonstrating an impressive win percentage of 80%. However, their performance on indoor hard surfaces has been subpar, winning none of the two matches played. The significance of surface preference cannot be ignored when making predictions.
Player level and its relevance to predicting favorites:
Considering recent statistics, Lemaitre has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments over the past year, securing victories in 42.86% of matches played. In contrast, Tichackova has mostly participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with prize money of $10K, triumphing in an outstanding 87.5% of matches played. When comparing statistics between players to determine the favorite, it is important to consider the level of the events they have been competing in, as it significantly impacts their performance.
Opponent quality and its influence:
Examining opponents faced over the last 12 months, Lemaitre has encountered players with an average rank of 390.77. Meanwhile, Tichackova's opponents had an average rank slightly higher at 415.85. These figures emphasize the level of competition faced by each player and can offer valuable insights for making predictions.
Deciding set performance and its relevance in live betting:
For those interested in live predictions and betting, the performance of both players in deciding sets proves significant. Over the past 12 months, Lemaitre has emerged victorious in 40% of such sets, while Tichackova's success rate stands at an impressive 67% in all matches played on tour. These statistics provide crucial information for making informed betting decisions.
Current event head-to-head statistics:
A player's historical performance serves as a useful tool in predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, it becomes essential to also consider the current event stats for indications of in-form players. To access the current event performance statistics, refer to the section below (if applicable). Additionally, some players exhibit superior performances at specific events, a factor that should be considered when predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion and its impact on live betting:
Recent statistics indicate that Lemaitre has excelled in converting breakpoint opportunities, successfully capitalizing on 43.64% of these chances. Tichackova has also showcased an impressive ability to break her opponents' serve, converting 57.24% of her opportunities. These figures undoubtedly provide valuable insights for those engaging in live betting, particularly when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts)
Tiphanie Lemaitre Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Fang Ying Xun
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Yingqun Sun
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Matilde Mariani
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Sara Daavettila
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
80%
(
28 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tiphanie Lemaitre
Player
Amelie Van Impe
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Eliska Tichackova Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Marie Villet
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Viola Turini
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Elena Milovanovic
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Rinko Matsuda
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
72 of
109)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
93
|
6-0 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Mina Hodzic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Daria Shadchneva
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Adelina Lachinova
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Eliska Tichackova
Player
Sofia Shapatava
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
See recent tennis photos of Lemaitre and Tichackova
Other Predictions
- Loading news...