Tina Nadine Smith vs Alica RUSOVA Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs RUSOVA analysis and find out who is favored!
Tina Nadine Smith vs Alica RUSOVA Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 51.22% of points on his second serve, while RUSOVA has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 50.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while RUSOVA has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.09% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 59.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas RUSOVA has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 59.77% of matches played (W/L 52/ 35), with RUSOVA winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 38/ 38). RUSOVA has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.47% of matches (W/L 52/ 34), where as RUSOVA has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.28 while RUSOVA has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while RUSOVA has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 47.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and RUSOVA has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 0 - 0 RUSOVA
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tina Nadine Smith | Alica RUSOVA |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (38/25) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (315/253) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.25 | N/A |
Aces Total | 69 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.29 | N/A |
DFs Total | 80 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:42 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 242.48 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 60% (1038/1721) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 68% (708/1038) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (363/683) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (96/210) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 45% (790/1769) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 65% (17/9) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 83% (18/15) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 17% (18/3) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | N/A |
Tina Nadine Smith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Emerson Jones
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Monique Barry
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Bianca Compuesto
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Jelena Cvijanovic
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
SF |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Lizette Cabrera
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Amelia Zylberman
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Zoe Hives
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naho Sato
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Alica RUSOVA Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Carson Branstine
Player
Alica Rusova
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
82%
(
37 of
45)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 1-6 6-4 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more