Timea Babos vs Sophie Chang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L L L L
Form
W W L L L L L L L LH2H: Babos 2 - 0 Chang
They have played 4 sets in total, with Babos winning 4 and Chang winning 0. The last match between Babos and Chang was at the W75 Zephyrhills, 09-05-2024, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Timea Babos getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Timea Babos | 2 |
| Sophie Chang | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Zephyrhills(09-05-2024)
Timea Babos
Sophie Chang
6
3
6
4
| Babos | Stats | Chang |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 895 | Ranking | 343 |
| 25 | Highest Rank | 217 |
| 32 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 4 |
| 56% (434-339) | Career Total W/L | 50% (270-274) |
| $1,938,196 | Career Prize Money | $45,925 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Popyrin VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
16 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 14 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:52:30 | Average Match Time | 1:52:30 |
| 66% (100/152) | 1st Serve % | 61% (87/143) |
| 63% (63/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (47/87) |
| 40% (21/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 43% (12/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (6/21) |
| 53% (76/143) | Return Points Win % | 45% (68/152) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Timea Babos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Timea Babos
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Timea Babos
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
119)
3
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
119)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(7) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Timea Babos
53%
(
53 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
6
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
11
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Timea Babos
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Timea Babos
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sophie Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Player
Sophie Chang
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mia Ristic
Player
Sophie Chang
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Sophie Chang
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Sophie Chang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Whitney Osuigwe
Player
Sophie Chang
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sophie Chang
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (434/339) | Win/Loss | 50% (270/274) |
| 56% (998/797) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (627/614) |
| 52% (8777/8090) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5877/5717) |
| 55% (208/172) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (131/135) |
| 54% (111/95) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (126/107) |
| 69% (91/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 29% (10/24) |
| 43% (24/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2455 | Aces Total | 1182 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 2274 | Total Double Faults | 2443 |
| 1:16:45 | Average Match Time | 1:14:49 |
| 475.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 494.97 |
| 62% (26229/42624) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16216/27635) |
| 66% (17380/26229) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (10342/16216) |
| 45% (7308/16391) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (4756/11419) |
| 44% (2086/4689) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1546/3227) |
| 42% (17828/42259) | Return Points Win % | 45% (12052/26625) |
| 39% (29/45) | Slam W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 43% (42/55) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (11/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (122/129) | Main Tour W/L | 30% (8/19) |
| 67% (203/101) | Challenger W/L | 50% (231/227) |
| 90% (27/3) | Futures W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 56% (427/762) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (266/536) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (103/197) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (65/129) |
| 47% (122/258) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (70/161) |
| 85% (438/372) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (281/232) |
| 15% (438/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (281/47) |
| 18% (335/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (263/36) |
Babos vs. Chang Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
