Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rijthoven vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rijthoven has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 49.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rijthoven has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 67.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nava winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rijthoven winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 0 and Nava winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Nava was at the M25 Vale Do Lobo, 28-10-2020, First, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rijthoven and Nava have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rijthoven winning 0 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rijthoven winning 0, and Nava 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 284.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rijthoven has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 39.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 0 - 1 Nava
871
Rank
101
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
62% (234-141)
Career Total W/L
60% (170-113)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$499,600
Career Prize Money
$402,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (53/86) | 60% (33/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (33/53) | 91% (30/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (20/33) | 68% (15/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 18% (10/55) | 38% (33/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (35/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (320/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 210 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 289.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1237/1949) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (902/1237) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (358/712) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (63/152) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (652/1834) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rijthoven Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
