Prediction of Tim Van Rijthoven vs Dane Webb Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Van Rijthoven vs D. Webb

Tim Van Rijthoven
NED
l
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
32
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
871
C. Rank
Ret.
101
Best Rank
0
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$499.6K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Dane Webb
USA
l
l
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
28
Age
32
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
871
C. Rank
Ret.
101
Best Rank
0
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$499.6K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 0 Webb
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tim Van Rijthoven winning 2 and Dane Webb winning 0. The last match between Tim Van Rijthoven and Dane Webb was at the USA F39, 29-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rijthoven | 1 |
| Webb | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) USA F39(11-29-16)
Tim Van Rijthoven
6
6
Dane Webb
4
3
T. V. Rijthoven vs D. Webb H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $499,600 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.42% (234-147) | Career Total W/L | 58.82% (80-56) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. V. Rijthoven vs D. Webb Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tim Van Rijthoven has won 24.00% of points on their second serve, while Dane Webb has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tim Van Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 58.33% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dane Webb has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 20.93% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tim Van Rijthoven has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dane Webb has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tim Van Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/2), with Dane Webb winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tim Van Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 80/43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/48). Dane Webb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 59/38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 14/12).
- Player level: In the last year, Tim Van Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/2), where as Dane Webb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tim Van Rijthoven winning 1 times and Dane Webb being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tim Van Rijthoven winning 2 and Dane Webb winning 0.
- The last match between Tim Van Rijthoven and Dane Webb was at the USA F39, 29-11-2016, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tim Van Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.5 while Dane Webb has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tim Van Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dane Webb has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tim Van Rijthoven has converted 14.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dane Webb has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Dane Webb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. V. Rijthoven vs D. Webb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 65% (31/48) | 1st Serve % | 70% (37/53) |
| 94% (29/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (25/37) |
| 65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (20/53) | Return Points Win % | 17% (8/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Rijthoven 28%, Webb 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Rijthoven 51%, Webb 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Rijthoven 47%, Webb 0%.
T. V. Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-7(6) 7-6(3) 6-1 | ||
D. Webb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
Pre-Q | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||

T. V. Rijthoven vs D. Webb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.42% (234/147) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.82% (80/56) |
| 58.83% (523/366) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.72% (173/132) |
| 52.51% (4644/4200) | Games Win/Loss | 53.51% (1496/1300) |
| 65.04% (80/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.82% (59/38) |
| 55.96% (61/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 62.50% (85/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 2679 | Aces Total | 94 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 856 | Total Double Faults | 64 |
| 1:29:3 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 525.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.24 |
| 63% (15453/24382) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1050/1579) |
| 75% (11614/15453) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (704/1050) |
| 54% (4789/8929) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (244/529) |
| 39% (802/2067) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (59/126) |
| 36% (9251/25495) | Return Points Win % | 36% (575/1576) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (13/13) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.26% (84/68) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 69.57% (128/56) | Futures W/L | 61.48% (75/47) |
| 62% (227/367) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (79/135) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (99/174) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (9/26) |
| 59% (74/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 88% (227/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (73/66) |
| 12% (227/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (73/7) |
| 22% (154/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (63/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction11:05 PM 14/11/25
Prediction09:35 PM 14/11/25
Prediction01:00 AM 15/11/25
Prediction01:30 AM 15/11/25
Prediction09:55 PM 14/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 6-3
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico