Tim VAN DER Horst vs Louis VAN Herck Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Horst vs Herck analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim VAN DER Horst vs Louis VAN Herck Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Horst has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Herck has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Horst, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Herck has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Horst has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Herck has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Horst has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Herck winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Horst has played against opponents with an average rank of while Herck has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Horst has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Herck has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Horst has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Herck has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Horst 0 - 0 Herck
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Tim VAN DER Horst Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Piotr Grynkowski
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Niklas Schell
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Ingo Herzgerodt
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Der Horst
Player
Romain Gales
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Louis VAN Herck Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Louis Van Herck
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Robert Strombachs
Player
Louis Van Herck
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
QF |
Louis Van Herck
Player
Eskander Guryev
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Matteo Rocci
Player
Louis Van Herck
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yanki Erel
Player
Louis Van Herck
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Louis Van Herck
Player
Clement Deleersnyder
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Louis Van Herck
Player
Daniel Lara Salmeron
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more