Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Smyczek vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smyczek vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Smyczek vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smyczek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smyczek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smyczek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smyczek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smyczek has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 92/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 42/ 49). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smyczek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smyczek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smyczek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smyczek 0 - 0 Voest
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Smyczek | Rik De Voest |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tim Smyczek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Milos Raonic
Player
Tim Smyczek
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Matthew Ebden
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Norbert Gombos
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
15
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Tim Smyczek
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
John-Patrick Smith
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Tim Smyczek
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Tim Smyczek
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Smyczek Vs Voest Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
