Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Sandkaulen vs Loic Cloes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandkaulen vs Cloes analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Sandkaulen vs Loic Cloes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandkaulen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cloes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandkaulen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cloes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandkaulen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cloes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandkaulen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cloes winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandkaulen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 30/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6). Cloes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 37/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 27/ 29).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sandkaulen winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sandkaulen winning 2 and Cloes winning 1. The last match between Sandkaulen and Cloes was at the M15 Monastir, 31-01-2022, Q3, Hard with Tim Sandkaulen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandkaulen and Cloes have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sandkaulen winning 1 times and Cloes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sandkaulen winning 0, and Cloes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandkaulen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cloes has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandkaulen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cloes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandkaulen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cloes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandkaulen 1 - 0 Cloes
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
62% (73-44)
Career Total W/L
57% (65-50)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sandkaulen VS Cloes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tim Sandkaulen | Loic Cloes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sandkaulen VS Cloes H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-0 10-6 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Sandkaulen | Loic Cloes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tim Sandkaulen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Opitz
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
9
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matthew William Donald
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Stefano D'Agostino
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Loic Cloes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Blaydes
Player
Loic Cloes
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeongseok Jeong
Player
Loic Cloes
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Cloes
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Loic Cloes
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
6
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Loic Cloes
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
128)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
14
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
128)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Loic Cloes
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Cloes
Player
Loann Massard
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Loic Cloes
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
10
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Loic Cloes
Player
Tim Handel
52%
(
69 of
132)
1st Serve %
54%
(
64 of
118)
7
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
11
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
41%
(
26 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
53 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
128
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Sandkaulen Vs Cloes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
