Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Henman vs John Van Lottum Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henman vs Lottum analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Henman vs John Van Lottum Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lottum has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lottum has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lottum has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lottum winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 80/ 34), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 61/ 50). Lottum has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lottum has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lottum has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lottum has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Henman 0 - 0 Lottum
N/A
Rank
High
49
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
48
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Henman | John Van Lottum |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tim Henman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Tim Henman
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
68%
(
89 of
131)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
63 of
89)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
35 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
131)
131
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(2) 2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Henman
Player
Dmitry Tursunov
64%
(
83 of
130)
1st Serve %
49%
(
57 of
116)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
11
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
48 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
128
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Chela
Player
Tim Henman
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Isner
Player
Tim Henman
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
18
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
51 of
59)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
50 of
63)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
19 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Tim Henman
64%
(
94 of
148)
1st Serve %
73%
(
115 of
158)
13
Aces
16
8
Double Faults
6
79%
(
74 of
94)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
87 of
115)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
30%
(
45 of
148)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
50 of
158)
153
Total Points Won
153
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) 3-6 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Henman
Player
Carlos Moya
64%
(
121 of
190)
1st Serve %
64%
(
127 of
199)
10
Aces
17
9
Double Faults
6
71%
(
86 of
121)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
92 of
127)
52%
(
36 of
69)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
68 of
190)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
70 of
199)
192
Total Points Won
197
|
6-3 1-6 5-7 6-2 13-11 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Tursunov
Player
Tim Henman
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(7) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Henman
Player
Michael Russell
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Tim Henman
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
John Van Lottum Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Wayne Arthurs
Player
John van Lottum
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
15
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Ricardo Mello
56%
(
69 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
92)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
51 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
56 of
133)
128
Total Points Won
128
|
3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
John van Lottum
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Lars Uebel
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John van Lottum
Player
Jean-Rene Lisnard
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Henman Vs Lottum Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
