H. Wendelken
To Win
T. Handel
To Win
Tim Handel vs Dan Added Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L L L W
Form
W L W W W L L L L WHead To Head: Handel 0 - 0 Added
They have played 2 sets in total, with Handel winning 0 and Added winning 2. The last match between Handel and Added was at the M25 Trento, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Dan Added getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tim Handel | 0 |
| Dan Added | 0 |
M25 Trento(18-02-2025)
7
5
6
2
Upcoming Match
27 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
Upcoming Match
27 Mar 2025 / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Dan Added
Player
Tim Handel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:50:29 | Average Match Time | 1:50:29 |
| 47% (34/72) | 1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) |
| 68% (23/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (27/37) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (15/25) |
| 0% (0/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 32% (20/62) | Return Points Win % | 44% (32/72) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tim Handel vs Dan Added Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tim Handel 0 - 0 Dan Added
- Recent trends in second serve performance: In the past six months, Handel has demonstrated commendable proficiency in their second serve, securing victory in 48.32% of points. On the other hand, the formidable Added has shown even greater prowess, triumphing in 51.04% of second serve points. It is worth noting that a strong correlation exists between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Analysis of return game statistics: Recent return game statistics reveal that Handel has excelled in returning their opponent's second serve, seizing victory in an impressive 55.16% of points. Conversely, Added has displayed commendable skill by clinching victory in 50.76% of second serve return points. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Handel boasts a success rate of 36.97%, whereas Added maintains a respectful 34.82%. These figures hold significant influence when determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure assessment: When faced with intense pressure and the imminent loss of a game, Handel has demonstrated resilience by saving an impressive 56.09% of breakpoints in recent encounters. Similarly, Added has proven their ability to navigate challenging situations by saving 58.57% of breakpoints. This statistic holds valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the last year, Handel has showcased their remarkable skills on the court, securing victory in 53.85% of matches played, with an impressive win-loss ratio of 28/24. Meanwhile, Added has exhibited exceptional prowess, winning 55.07% of matches and maintaining a win-loss record of 38/31. These overall figures provide a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head clash.
- Mastery of specific surfaces: Handel's most dominant surface throughout their illustrious career has undeniably been Clay, boasting a formidable 63% win ratio with a remarkable win-loss record of 134/79. However, their triumphs are less assured on I.hard surfaces, where they possess a 45% win ratio with a modest record of 13/16. As for Added, they excel on Hard courts, with a remarkable win ratio of 61% (W/L 106/67), while their Grass court performances witness a less stellar win ratio of 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player caliber: Over the past year, Handel has actively participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize pool, emerging triumphant in an impressive 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/18). Similarly, Added has showcased their exceptional skills within the same tournament circuit, garnering victory in 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/18). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is crucial to consider the level of events in which they partake.
- Opponent quality analysis: Handel's encounters over the past twelve months have been against opponents boasting an average rank of 401.23. Conversely, Added has faced adversaries with an average rank of 467.75. This insight sheds light on the level of competition both players have encountered and influences their respective predicted outcomes.
- Deciding set performance compared to all players: For those eager to engage in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Handel has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets throughout their past twelve months of competition. Meanwhile, Added has secured victory in 54% of all matches played on the professional tour. Such figures serve as valuable indicators for in-game betting considerations.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance serves as a significant factor when predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to examine current event statistics to gauge the form of each player. For an in-depth understanding of the players' current prowess, kindly refer to the section below (if they have already participated in the ongoing event). Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players may exhibit enhanced performance levels in specific events, which can greatly affect the predicted outcomes.
- Break point conversion rates: In recent encounters, Handel masterfully converted 43.54% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Added impressively capitalized on 41.15% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics provide fruitful insights for in-game and live betting, enabling bettors to make informed decisions when a breakpoint opportunity arises for either player.
- If the prospect of utilizing models that predict tennis matches intrigues you, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, please note that its content caters predominantly to the interests of statistical aficionados.
Tim Handel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
4 of
9)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
16
Total Points Won
9
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mae Malige
Player
Tim Handel
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Tim Handel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
5 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Tim Handel
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Tibo Colson
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Jonas Schaer
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
56
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Tim Handel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Tim Handel
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Tim Handel
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
9 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
58 of
99)
113
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Added Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Jan Jermar
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve %
78%
(
14 of
18)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
17
Total Points Won
15
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Dan Added
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Dussin
Player
Dan Added
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Dan Added
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
75 of
128)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
53 of
128)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Dan Added
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
113)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Giovanni Fonio
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Manuel Plunger
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Tim Handel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nino Ehrenschneider
Player
Dan Added
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Bogdan Pavel
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (190/133) | Win/Loss | 58% (300/221) |
| 58% (429/311) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (682/524) |
| 53% (3759/3376) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5972/5430) |
| 56% (35/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (106/67) |
| 63% (134/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (66/61) |
| 44% (21/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (127/91) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 837 | Aces Total | 2382 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 792 | Total Double Faults | 863 |
| 1:27:10 | Average Match Time | 1:36:41 |
| 221.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 495.35 |
| 63% (11769/18728) | 1st Serve % | 59% (20341/34461) |
| 69% (8071/11769) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14318/20341) |
| 49% (3389/6959) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7048/14119) |
| 42% (817/1936) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1437/3368) |
| 40% (7677/18960) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13766/34436) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (10/18) | Challenger W/L | 43% (54/73) |
| 61% (180/115) | Futures W/L | 63% (245/146) |
| 58% (186/318) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (295/515) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 58% (57/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (91/168) |
| 46% (46/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (80/164) |
| 88% (193/169) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (304/263) |
| 12% (193/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (304/41) |
| 16% (130/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (217/37) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tim Handel
View full predicted draw for Handel in Dizier
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dan Added
View full predicted draw for Added in Dizier
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
