Tilwith Di Girolami vs Haruna Arakawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L W L W L L LHead To Head: Girolami 0 - 1 Arakawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Girolami winning 0 and Arakawa winning 2. The last match between Girolami and Arakawa was at the W50 Spring, 17-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Haruna Arakawa getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tilwith Di Girolami | 0 |
| Haruna Arakawa | 1 |
W50 Spring(17-02-2025)
7
5
6
4
| Girolami | Stats | Arakawa |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (2-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (5-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 823 | Ranking | 489 |
| 625 | Highest Rank | 352 |
| 21 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 51% (88-83) | Career Total W/L | 52% (223-207) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:50:17 | Average Match Time | 1:50:17 |
| 77% (58/75) | 1st Serve % | 62% (58/94) |
| 47% (27/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (32/58) |
| 35% (6/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
| 28% (5/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (7/14) |
| 48% (45/94) | Return Points Win % | 56% (42/75) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tilwith Di Girolami vs Haruna Arakawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tilwith Di Girolami 0 - 1 Haruna Arakawa
Predictions for the upcoming tennis match:
- Recent form analysis of second serve performance:
- Insights from return game stats in recent form:
- Under pressure analysis:
- Performance overview:
- Assessing the best playing surfaces:
- Player level and tournament types:
- Opponent quality statistics:
- Deciding set performance versus all players:
- Current event head-to-head statistics:
- Break point conversion rate:
- If you are interested in utilizing models that predict the outcomes of tennis matches, I encourage you to explore this article. However, please be aware that it caters more towards individuals with a strong statistical inclination.
In their recent form over the span of the last six months, Girolami has demonstrated a 45.53% success rate in winning points on their second serve, while Arakawa has exhibited a slightly higher success rate of 48.18%. It is worth noting that there exists a noteworthy correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Turning our attention to return stats, Girolami's recent form illustrates a commendable 56.29% proficiency in winning their opponents' second serve points, with Arakawa closely trailing at 59.14%. Additionally, Girolami boasts return game stats of 43.4% and 41.47% for first serve returns, respectively. The correlation between these figures and the determination of the more likely favored player in this head-to-head matchup is a key element to consider.
Examining the response of players under pressure, Girolami has successfully saved 52.23% of breakpoints in their recent form, while Arakawa boasts a close 51.69% rate of success in this area. These statistics serve as invaluable tools for in-game betting predictions.
Over the course of the past year, Girolami has achieved a 48.98% victory rate in their matches played, with a win-loss record of 24 wins and 25 losses. On the other hand, Arakawa has exhibited a higher success rate of 56.72% with a win-loss record of 38 wins and 29 losses. These figures provide us with an insightful overview to predict the head-to-head outcome of this upcoming match.
Turning our attention to the players' performance on different surfaces, it becomes apparent that Girolami excels on Hard courts, with a 57% career win rate (30 wins and 23 losses) on this surface. In contrast, their performance on I.hard courts yields a relatively lower win rate of 40% (6 wins and 9 losses). As for Arakawa, their best career surface is I.hard, resulting in a remarkable win rate of 63% (12 wins and 7 losses). On the other hand, Grass courts pose a greater challenge for Arakawa, as they have not secured a single victory on this surface (0 wins and 2 losses).
Considering the player level and tournament types, Girolami has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, achieving a 50% success rate (17 wins and 17 losses). Conversely, Arakawa has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, and has secured victories in 57.14% of their matches (36 wins and 27 losses). When comparing these statistics to predict the favored player, it is essential to take into account the level of competition they have faced in their respective events.
Over the past year, Girolami's opponents have possessed an average ranking of 359.14, while Arakawa has faced players with an average rank of 428.07. These opponent quality statistics provide further insights into the players' levels and the challenges they have encountered.
In scenarios where the match goes into a deciding set, Girolami has proven successful in 36% of such encounters over the past 12 months. In comparison, Arakawa boasts a slightly higher success rate of 43% in all matches played on the professional tour. These figures are of particular interest for those who engage in live predictions and betting.
While past player performance serves as a valuable predictor of tennis matches, once an event is underway, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to assess the players' current form. To obtain insights into the in-form player indication, I highly recommend examining the section below containing the players' performance in the ongoing event. It is also worth noting that certain players showcase better performances at specific events, an aspect that should be taken into account when determining the likely outcome of this match.
Turning our attention to recent form, Girolami has impressively converted 47.37% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Arakawa has exhibited a slightly higher conversion rate of 49.21% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. These statistics serve as valuable indicators for live betting tips, especially when players find themselves in breakpoint situations.
Tilwith Di Girolami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Cross
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
82%
(
41 of
50)
6
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ilay Yoruk
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
85%
(
60 of
71)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Denislava Glushkova
91%
(
48 of
53)
1st Serve %
86%
(
59 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
85%
(
88 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
106
Total Points Won
84
|
6-0 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Lavinia Luciano
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Alja Senica
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Haruna Arakawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Haruna Arakawa
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Haruna Arakawa
41%
(
18 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Haruna Arakawa
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Janice Tjen
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Haruna Arakawa
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Tilwith Di Girolami
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Maria Kononova
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Haruna Arakawa
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Haruna Arakawa
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (88/83) | Win/Loss | 52% (223/207) |
| 52% (201/184) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (497/465) |
| 52% (1843/1717) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4365/4251) |
| 56% (32/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (167/148) |
| 51% (50/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (18/23) |
| 40% (6/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (38/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 56 | Aces Total | 148 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 613 | Total Double Faults | 857 |
| 1:30:11 | Average Match Time | 1:32:26 |
| 441.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 513.21 |
| 72% (7350/10273) | 1st Serve % | 69% (16623/24252) |
| 57% (4162/7350) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (9294/16623) |
| 41% (1197/2923) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3406/7631) |
| 49% (702/1433) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1643/3319) |
| 48% (5044/10508) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11670/24290) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (29/32) | Challenger W/L | 48% (156/168) |
| 54% (59/51) | Futures W/L | 64% (67/38) |
| 51% (87/170) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (220/421) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (13/39) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (40/72) |
| 40% (17/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (56/109) |
| 86% (86/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (227/194) |
| 14% (86/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (227/33) |
| 16% (85/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (203/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
