Tibo Colson vs Anthony Wright Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W L W L L W LHead To Head: Colson 1 - 0 Wright
They have played 3 sets in total, with Colson winning 2 and Wright winning 1. The last match between Colson and Wright was at the M25 Heraklion, 29-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Tibo Colson getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tibo Colson | 1 |
| Anthony Wright | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Heraklion(29-05-2025)
Tibo Colson
Anthony Wright
6
3
4
6
6
1
| Colson | Stats | Wright |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (31-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (10-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 441 | Ranking | N/A |
| 395 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 25 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 60% (151-100) | Career Total W/L | 51% (23-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchiyama VS Baadi PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shick VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Tibo Colson
Player
Anthony Wright
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
18
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 10 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:4:49 | Average Match Time | 2:4:49 |
| 70% (55/79) | 1st Serve % | 62% (54/87) |
| 69% (38/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (37/54) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (10/33) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 46% (40/87) | Return Points Win % | 35% (28/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Colson vs Wright Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Colson has a slight advantage, winning 44.11% of second serve points, compared to Wright's 40.91%. Does this give Colson a lead? Possibly, as this statistic is highly related to match outcomes.
- Return Game: Wright excels in return games, securing 55.07% of second serve return points and 30.59% of first serve returns, outpacing Colson in both categories (46.75% and 20.39% respectively). Does this make Wright the frontrunner in return play? Likely.
- Under Pressure: Colson seems more resilient under pressure, saving 58.53% of breakpoints, slightly better than Wright's 54.17%. Can Colson maintain this advantage? It’s a key indicator for in-game dynamics.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Wright has a superior win rate of 77.78% (7/2), compared to Colson's 59.02% (36/25). Does this point to Wright's consistent form? Yes, indeed.
- Best Surface: Wright prefers Hard courts with a success rate of 57%, while Colson's forte is Indoor Hard with 66% wins. Will surface preference impact the outcome? It’s possible.
- Player Level: Wright typically competes and excels at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 77.78%. Colson, also prevalent at this level, wins 64.44%. Does this make Wright more adept at such events? Quite likely.
- Opponent Quality: Wright has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (72.67) compared to Colson's 452, indicating a possibly tougher competition level for Wright.
- Deciding Set Performance: Wright's prowess in deciding sets is impeccable, boasting a 100% win rate over the past year, while Colson lags at 48%. Could this be decisive? Certainly, in a tight match.
- Break Point Conversion: Wright has shown better conversion on break points, with 43.75% success versus Colson’s 30.53%, an important factor during crucial points.
Editorial Prediction (May 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performances and statistics of both players, it's apparent that Wright holds several key advantages over Colson, particularly in return games and break point conversions. This could play a decisive role in the outcome of this match.
While Colson shows a slight edge in second serve points and resilience under pressure, Wright's overall match win rate and ability to perform in deciding sets are significant strengths. Additionally, Wright's history of competing against higher-ranked opponents might provide an upper hand due to experience against tougher competitors.
Ultimately, based on these numerous factors, Wright appears to be the likely winner of this upcoming match. However, as with any sporting event, elements like current form during the event and mental composure on the day could influence the final result.
Colson vs Wright Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tibo Colson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tomasz Berkieta
Player
Tibo Colson
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Kacper Szymkowiak
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Noel Larwig
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Bruno Kokot
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
52
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Tibo Colson
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
119)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
63 of
119)
122
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Jack Loge
37%
(
22 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Arthur Weber
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Abel Forger
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anthony Wright Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 7-5 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (151/100) | Win/Loss | 51% (23/22) |
| 59% (346/236) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (56/51) |
| 54% (2998/2584) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (542/517) |
| 62% (50/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) |
| 54% (49/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (9/10) |
| 65% (52/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.69 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1887 | Aces Total | 38 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 674 | Total Double Faults | 28 |
| 1:27:21 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 427.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 133 |
| 60% (9328/15650) | 1st Serve % | 60% (576/966) |
| 74% (6940/9328) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (373/576) |
| 49% (3096/6321) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (159/390) |
| 41% (626/1512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (45/102) |
| 39% (6185/15784) | Return Points Win % | 43% (399/936) |
| 44% (16/20) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (135/80) | Futures W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 61% (150/245) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 51% (39/76) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 49% (42/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 89% (146/130) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (25/20) |
| 11% (146/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (25/5) |
| 21% (105/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (20/3) |
Colson vs. Wright Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
