Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tianmi Mi vs Carolin Raschdorf Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mi vs Raschdorf analysis and find out who is favored!
Tianmi Mi vs Carolin Raschdorf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mi has won 42% of points on his second serve, while Raschdorf has won 42.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mi, in recent form, has won 57.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Raschdorf has won 56.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.88% and 49.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mi has saved 57.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Raschdorf has saved 55.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mi has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Raschdorf winning 54.17% (W/L 13/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 26/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 32/ 23). Raschdorf has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Mi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Raschdorf has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 7/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mi winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mi winning 2 and Raschdorf winning 1. The last match between Mi and Raschdorf was at the W25 Palmanova, 19-03-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Tianmi Mi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mi and Raschdorf have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mi winning 1 times and Raschdorf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mi winning 0, and Raschdorf 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mi has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.38 while Raschdorf has played against players with an average rank of 160.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mi has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Raschdorf has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mi has converted 55.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Raschdorf has converted 47.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mi 1 - 0 Raschdorf
660
Rank
639
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
62% (58-35)
Career Total W/L
47% (29-33)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
71% (5-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tianmi Mi | Carolin Raschdorf |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 20 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 10-6 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tianmi Mi | Carolin Raschdorf |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 71% (5/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (26/17) | 67% (10/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (200/160) | 58% (77/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 83% (5/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:22 | 1:14:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.74 | 57 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (785/1251) | 60% (214/356) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (470/785) | 58% (125/214) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (197/466) | 42% (59/142) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (81/150) | 48% (30/62) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (549/1125) | 53% (179/340) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 71% (5/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Tianmi Mi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Tianmi Mi
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
50 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
106)
2
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
8
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Unknown Player
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Meng Yi Chen
Player
Tianmi Mi
84%
(
71 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Tianmi Mi
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Tianmi Mi
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Vlada Zvereva
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
93)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Diana Yakovleva
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
42%
(
26 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Tianmi Mi
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
67%
(
4 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
9
Total Points Won
5
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Daniela Vismane
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carolin Raschdorf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Carolin Raschdorf
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolin Raschdorf
Player
Anastasia Grechkina
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
6
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
54 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolin Raschdorf
Player
Josy Daems
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolin Raschdorf
Player
Darya Kharlanova
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carolin Raschdorf
Player
Zeynep Ilker
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matilda Mutavdzic
Player
Carolin Raschdorf
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Olga Helmi
Player
Carolin Raschdorf
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
1
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
58%
(
39 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
48 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mi Vs Raschdorf Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
