T. Braithwaite
To Win
TBD
To Win
Thomas Braithwaite vs Joshua Sheehy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L W L
Form
L W W L L W W L W WHead-to-head: Braithwaite 1 - 0 Sheehy
They have played 2 sets in total, with Braithwaite winning 2 and Sheehy winning 0. The last match between Braithwaite and Sheehy was at the M25 Burnie, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Thomas Braithwaite getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
M25 Burnie(19-02-2025)
6
1
6
2
50% (5-5)
YTD Win/Loss
54% (7-6)
1
Head-to-Head
0
886
Ranking
752
815
Highest Rank
678
25
Age
28
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
1
58% (81-58)
Career Total W/L
50% (111-111)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Pavlyuchenkova VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Braithwaite VS Sheehy H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Braithwaite VS Sheehy H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
3
4
Aces (Total)
5
4
Total Double Faults
1
1:25:33
Average Match Time
1:25:33
70% (39/56)
1st Serve %
68% (38/56)
74% (29/39)
1st Serve Win %
55% (21/38)
53% (9/17)
2nd Serve Win %
33% (6/18)
33% (4/12)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/4)
52% (29/56)
Return Points Win %
32% (18/56)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thomas Braithwaite vs Joshua Sheehy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Thomas Braithwaite 1 - 0 Joshua Sheehy
Prediction Analysis for Upcoming Tennis Match
When it comes to predicting the outcome of a tennis match, a comprehensive analysis of several factors is essential. These include second serve performance, return game stats, under pressure analysis, performance overview, preferred surfaces, player level, opponent quality, deciding set performance, current event H2H stats, and break point conversion. Let's dive into each of these aspects to gain insights for the upcoming match.
-
Second Serve Performance Recent Form:
In their recent form over the last six months, Braithwaite has exhibited a commendable performance on their second serve, winning 52% of the points. On the other hand, Sheehy has demonstrated even better results, triumphing in 53.94% of the second serve points. The high correlation between these statistics and match prediction accuracy cannot be overlooked.
-
Return Game Stats Recent Form:
The return game statistics provide valuable insights into a player's proficiency. Analyzing recent form, Braithwaite has proven to be dominant, having won an impressive 47.31% of their opponent's second serve points. However, Sheehy has not lagged far behind, securing victories in 42.97% of such points. Similarly, in terms of first serve returns, Braithwaite boasts a 31.78% success rate while Sheehy's stands at 32.04%. These figures hold a direct correlation to determine the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
-
Under Pressure Analysis:
Under pressure, Braithwaite has showcased resilience by saving 63.51% of breakpoints in recent form. Comparatively, Sheehy has managed to save 59.44% of such crucial points, making this statistic a useful tool for in-game betting predictions.
-
Performance Overview:
Drawing insights from their performance in the past year, Braithwaite has emerged victorious in 59.26% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 16/11. In contrast, Sheehy's success rate stands at 45.1% (W/L 23/28). These figures provide an overview to predict the head-to-head outcome.
-
Best Surface:
Tennis players often exhibit varying levels of expertise on different surfaces. Braithwaite's success percentage on grass is an impressive 63% (W/L 10/6), which makes it their best career surface. Conversely, their performance record on clay is not as strong, with only a 33% success rate (W/L 1/2). Turning to Sheehy, they excel on hard courts, winning 51% of matches (W/L 89/87). However, their performance on clay is subpar, with a win percentage of 36% (W/L 5/9).
-
Player Level:
To accurately predict the favorite player, one must consider the level of competition they have been facing. In the past year, Braithwaite has primarily participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning an impressive 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/9). Similarly, Sheehy has predominantly played in the same tournaments, achieving a success rate of 54.05% (W/L 20/17). Thus, determining the more favored player depends on comparing their achievements relative to the event level they have been competing in.
-
Opponent Quality Stats:
It is crucial to evaluate the quality of opponents faced by the players. Over the past 12 months, Braithwaite has confronted opponents with an average rank of 286.67. Conversely, Sheehy's opponents have held an average rank of 440.67. These statistics shed light on the level of competition faced by each player.
-
Deciding Set Performance vs All Players:
For those interested in live predictions and betting, the performance of players in deciding sets holds significant importance. Braithwaite has demonstrated exceptional proficiency in such situations, winning an impressive 78% of deciding sets over the past year. On the other hand, Sheehy has won 48% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. This information serves as a valuable indicator for live betting strategies.
-
Current Event H2H Stats:
While past player performance provides a solid foundation for predictions, it is crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players in the ongoing tournament. These statistics can be found in the section below (if the players have already played matches in the current event). Additionally, it is essential to take into account the players' historical performance at specific events, as it may influence the outcome.
-
Break Point Conversion:
Break point conversion is another crucial aspect to consider when predicting match outcomes. In recent form, Braithwaite has displayed proficiency by converting 36.25% of breakpoint opportunities. Sheehy, on the other hand, has proven even more successful, converting 44.8% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. These statistics serve as valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in utilizing models for tennis match predictions, this article presents a comprehensive starting point. However, it is worth noting that it primarily caters to stats enthusiasts.
Thomas Braithwaite Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Ethan Cook
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
5
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Colin Sinclair
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
6
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Hayato Matsuoka
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
75 of
121)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
7
81%
(
60 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
31 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
119
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Joshua Sheehy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Evan Zhu
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Cleeve Harper
42%
(
31 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
8
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Shinji Hazawa
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Omar Jasika
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
13
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
59 of
87)
68%
(
27 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
22 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
39 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Joshua Sheehy
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Joshua Sheehy
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
53 of
73)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(0) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Jacob Brumm
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hayato Matsuoka
Player
Joshua Sheehy
79%
(
64 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (81/58)
Win/Loss
50% (111/111)
55% (176/143)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (256/255)
52% (1636/1483)
Games Win/Loss
50% (2528/2481)
58% (69/49)
Hard Win/Loss
51% (91/89)
33% (1/2)
Clay Win/Loss
44% (7/9)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (13/13)
61% (11/7)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.25
Aces Per Game
0.3
374
Aces Total
735
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.22
208
Total Double Faults
532
1:15:11
Average Match Time
1:16:55
262.91
Average Opponent Rank
395.22
70% (4663/6686)
1st Serve %
60% (6451/10835)
67% (3130/4663)
1st Serve Win %
70% (4500/6451)
50% (1021/2023)
2nd Serve Win %
51% (2254/4390)
37% (221/604)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (370/905)
37% (2481/6648)
Return Points Win %
37% (4047/10993)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (3/6)
Challenger W/L
34% (10/19)
60% (78/52)
Futures W/L
52% (101/92)
58% (81/139)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (110/221)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
43% (15/35)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
49% (33/67)
66% (27/41)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (33/68)
91% (70/64)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (118/98)
9% (70/6)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (118/19)
25% (69/17)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (104/12)
See recent tennis photos of Braithwaite and Sheehy
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
