Prediction of Thierry Pham vs Patrik Kuhnen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Pham vs P. Kuhnen

Thierry Pham

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

179

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Patrik Kuhnen

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

179

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Pham 1 - 0 Kuhnen

They have played 3 sets in total, with Thierry Pham winning 3 and Patrik Kuhnen winning 0. The last match between Thierry Pham and Patrik Kuhnen was at the Roland Garros, 25-05-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Thierry Pham getting the victory 7-6 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pham	1
Kuhnen	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Roland Garros(05-25-87)

Stats

Thierry Pham

Patrik Kuhnen

T. Pham vs P. Kuhnen H2H Profile

T. Pham	Stats	P. Kuhnen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
37.04% (20-34)	Career Total W/L	47.60% (149-164)
1	Clay	0
0	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Pham vs P. Kuhnen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thierry Pham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Patrik Kuhnen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thierry Pham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Patrik Kuhnen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Thierry Pham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patrik Kuhnen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Thierry Pham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Patrik Kuhnen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Thierry Pham has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 13/20), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/10). Patrik Kuhnen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 5/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 20/32).
Player level: In the last year, Thierry Pham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Patrik Kuhnen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thierry Pham winning 1 times and Patrik Kuhnen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Thierry Pham winning 3 and Patrik Kuhnen winning 0.
The last match between Thierry Pham and Patrik Kuhnen was at the Roland Garros, 25-05-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Thierry Pham getting the victory 7-6 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thierry Pham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Patrik Kuhnen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thierry Pham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patrik Kuhnen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Thierry Pham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patrik Kuhnen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Thierry Pham vs Patrik Kuhnen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Pham vs P. Kuhnen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Pham	Stats	P. Kuhnen
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	0
19	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Pham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Croydon CH - 13-02-1989
R3 Ville JanssonV. Jansson	L	3-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Brest CH - 28-11-1988
R3 Morten ChristensenM. Christensen	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Strasbourg CH - 14-11-1988
R3 Tomas NydahlT. Nydahl	L	6-4 4-6 6-3	Stats
Bordeaux - 25-07-1988
R4 Joakim NystromJ. Nystrom	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R3 Christian MiniussiC. Miniussi	W	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

P. Kuhnen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Beijing - 07-10-1996
R2 Sjeng SchalkenS. Schalken	L	6-4 7-6(4)	Stats
R1 Neville GodwinN. Godwin	W	5-7 6-3 6-3	Stats
Hamburg - 06-05-1996
R1 Albert CostaA. Costa	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Essen - 23-10-1995
R1 Byron BlackB. Black	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Vienna - 16-10-1995
R2 Oleg OgorodovO. Ogorodov	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Pham vs P. Kuhnen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Pham	Stats	P. Kuhnen
37.04% (20/34)	YTD Win/Loss	47.60% (149/164)
42.42% (56/76)	Sets Win/Loss	47.93% (383/416)
48.11% (612/660)	Games Win/Loss	49.16% (3811/3942)
37.50% (6/10)	Hard Win/Loss	47.93% (58/63)
39.39% (13/20)	Clay Win/Loss	38.46% (20/32)
20.00% (1/4)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.06% (52/46)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	45.24% (19/23)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
482.06	Average Opponent Rank	203.99
60.00% (3/2)	Slam W/L	50.00% (27/27)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	23.53% (4/13)
100.00% (2/0)	Cups W/L	66.67% (2/1)
28.57% (2/5)	Main Tour W/L	45.89% (95/112)
32.50% (13/27)	Challenger W/L	65.63% (21/11)
33% (16/48)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	47% (121/258)
67% (4/6)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (27/54)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	49% (26/53)
31% (5/16)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (48/97)
80% (20/16)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (146/119)
20% (20/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (146/27)
12% (34/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (166/29)