Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiemo De Bakker vs Rajeev Ram Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Ram analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiemo De Bakker vs Rajeev Ram Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ram has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ram has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ram has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ram winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ram has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ram has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ram has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bakker 0 - 0 Ram
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
40
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rajeev Ram Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Attila Balazs
Player
Rajeev Ram
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Rajeev Ram
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Rajeev Ram
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lukas Rosol
Player
Rajeev Ram
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Reilly Opelka
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
8
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Rajeev Ram
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
21 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Rajeev Ram
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Mirza Basic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rajeev Ram
Player
Stefan Kozlov
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Bakker Vs Ram Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
