Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Taisei Ichikawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Ichikawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Taisei Ichikawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 47.67% of points on his second serve, while Ichikawa has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 50.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ichikawa has won 48.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.39% and 35.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ichikawa has saved 58.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 51/ 27), with Ichikawa winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 188/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Ichikawa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.21% of matches (W/L 25/ 4), where as Ichikawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 26/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.37 while Ichikawa has played against players with an average rank of 132.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ichikawa has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 42.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ichikawa has converted 40.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wild 0 - 0 Ichikawa
63
Rank
63
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
703
Rank
686
High
23
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (222-167)
Career Total W/L
51% (95-93)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$586,675
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Taisei Ichikawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 56% (5/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (34/29) | 52% (11/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (303/288) | 51% (108/105) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 212.12 | 103 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1239/1951) | 63% (431/684) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (877/1239) | 70% (302/431) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (343/712) | 53% (134/253) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (65/145) | 37% (22/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (629/1757) | 37% (255/682) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 20% (5/1) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Karen Khachanov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jeff Wolf
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Taisei Ichikawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Siwanat Auytayakul
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Tao Mu
77%
(
79 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
76 of
121)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
30 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Scott Jones
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Corban Crowther
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Ichikawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Thiago Seyboth Wild
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
