Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs James Frawley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Frawley analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs James Frawley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.24% of points on his second serve, while Frawley has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 50.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frawley has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frawley has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 51/ 27), with Frawley winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 188/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Frawley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 23/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.21% of matches (W/L 25/ 4), where as Frawley has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wild winning 2 and Frawley winning 0. The last match between Wild and Frawley was at the Turkey F15 (Antalya), 17-04-2017, Q3, Clay with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Frawley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wild winning 0 times and Frawley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 0, and Frawley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.37 while Frawley has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frawley has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 41.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frawley has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wild 1 - 0 Frawley
67
Rank
65
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
628
Rank
607
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (222-167)
Career Total W/L
44% (66-84)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$576,510
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | James Frawley |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | James Frawley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (34/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (303/288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 212.12 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1239/1951) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (877/1239) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (343/712) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (65/145) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (629/1757) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Karen Khachanov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jeff Wolf
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
James Frawley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Frawley
Player
Martin Breysach
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Martinez
Player
James Frawley
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Charlie Camus
Player
James Frawley
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
10
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
James Frawley
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Thour
Player
James Frawley
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Frawley Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
