Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wild vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wild has won 48.24% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 50.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wild, in recent form, has won 50.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.37% and 34.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wild has saved 65.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 55.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wild has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 51/ 27), with Decamps winning 64.71% (W/L 33/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 188/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Wild has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.21% of matches (W/L 25/ 4), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wild winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wild winning 0 and Decamps winning 2. The last match between Wild and Decamps was at the Lyon Challenger, 07-06-2022, First, Clay with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wild and Decamps have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wild winning 0 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wild winning 0, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wild has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.37 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 218.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wild has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wild has converted 41.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wild 0 - 1 Decamps
67
Rank
65
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
659
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (222-167)
Career Total W/L
63% (160-92)
52% (13-12)
YTD W/L
71% (17-7)
$576,510
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:32 | 1:8:32 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (35/48) | 65% (35/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (24/35) | 86% (30/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 23% (3/13) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (15/54) | 44% (21/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thiago Seyboth Wild | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (13/12) | 71% (17/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (34/29) | 69% (36/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (303/288) | 57% (278/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 124 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:33 | 1:28:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 212.12 | 216.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1239/1951) | 62% (818/1327) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (877/1239) | 70% (569/818) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (343/712) | 50% (252/509) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (65/145) | 45% (76/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (629/1757) | 44% (621/1427) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (17/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 73% (16/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Luca Nardi
67%
(
85 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
101)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
21 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Nuno Borges
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Damir Dzumhur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Karen Khachanov
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jeff Wolf
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
39%
(
17 of
44)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Gabriel Decamps
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Louis Dussin
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Wild Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
