Theodore Dean vs Matisse Farzam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 04:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Dean vs M. Farzam

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dean 1 - 0 Farzam
They have played 3 sets in total, with Theodore Dean winning 2 and Matisse Farzam winning 1. The last match between Theodore Dean and Matisse Farzam was at the M15 Trois-Rivieres, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Theodore Dean getting the victory 2-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dean | 1 |
| Farzam | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Trois-Rivieres(10-30-25)
T. Dean vs M. Farzam H2H Profile
T. Dean vs M. Farzam Match Preview:
- Theodore Dean shows strong performance on their second serve in recent months, winning 42.02% of those points, while Matisse Farzam has not claimed any points on their second serve. This stat is crucial for predicting match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning serves, Dean has an edge with a 44.21% success rate on second serves and 27.75% on first serves, compared to Farzam's lack of success in these areas.
- Under pressure, Dean saves 51.35% of breakpoints, while Farzam has yet to save any, highlighting Dean's composure in critical match moments.
- Looking at the performance over the past year, Dean has won 72.22% of their matches compared to Farzam's 50% win rate. What does this suggest about their relative form?
- Dean excels on indoor hard courts with a perfect win rate, whereas Farzam finds more success on clay, although Dean still shows versatility across surfaces.
- Both players primarily compete in $10K ITF events with Dean having a higher win record, suggesting a competitive edge at this level.
- In terms of opponent strength, Dean has faced more highly-ranked players, implying exposure to tougher competition than Farzam.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Dean has a promising track record, winning 67% of such sets, while Farzam does not have comparable success.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match is poised to be an intriguing contest given the competitive dynamics at play. However, Theodore Dean's recent form, especially on second serves and return games, provides a strong foundation for anticipating success.
The consistency shown by Dean in pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, also suggests a mental edge that could prove decisive. Furthermore, Dean’s ability to perform across various surfaces reflects adaptability not mirrored by Farzam.
Taking into account these factors along with past performance against higher-ranked opponents, and Dean's strength in deciding sets, the probability leans strongly in favor of Dean securing victory in this matchup.
Theodore Dean vs Matisse Farzam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Dean vs M. Farzam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:40:45 | Average Match Time | 2:40:45 |
| 63% (59/94) | 1st Serve % | 59% (65/111) |
| 63% (37/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (39/65) |
| 57% (20/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 22% (4/18) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
| 43% (48/111) | Return Points Win % | 39% (37/94) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Dean Recent Matches Played
M. Farzam Recent Matches Played

T. Dean vs M. Farzam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.43% (15/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 66.67% (32/16) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.00% (10/15) |
| 54.27% (254/214) | Games Win/Loss | 46.99% (117/132) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 100.00% (4/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:40 |
| 244.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 304.7 |
| 67% (265/395) | 1st Serve % | 62% (259/420) |
| 63% (166/265) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (159/259) |
| 48% (62/130) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (78/161) |
| 27% (12/44) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (10/34) |
| 37% (151/409) | Return Points Win % | 36% (148/415) |
| 71.43% (15/6) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 71% (15/21) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 100% (4/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 67% (4/6) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 100% (12/12) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 0% (12/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 33% (9/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (6/2) |