Tessah Andrianjafitrimo vs Federica Urgesi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W L L L
Form
L W L W L W L W L LHead To Head: Andrianjafitrimo 1 - 0 Urgesi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Andrianjafitrimo winning 2 and Urgesi winning 1. The last match between Andrianjafitrimo and Urgesi was at the Open delle Puglie - Bari, 03-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Tessah Andrianjafitrimo getting the victory 1-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tessah Andrianjafitrimo | 1 |
| Federica Urgesi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Open delle Puglie - Bari(03-06-2025)
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Federica Urgesi
1
6
6
3
6
4
| Andrianjafitrimo | Stats | Urgesi |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (22-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (13-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 194 | Ranking | 429 |
| 139 | Highest Rank | 429 |
| 26 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (330-240) | Career Total W/L | 48% (64-70) |
| $128,498 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Halys VS Ficovich PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Goffin PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
16 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andrianjafitrimo VS Urgesi H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Federica Urgesi
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Andrianjafitrimo VS Urgesi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 13 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:25:26 | Average Match Time | 2:25:26 |
| 58% (52/89) | 1st Serve % | 64% (52/81) |
| 56% (29/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (24/52) |
| 46% (17/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (18/29) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 48% (39/81) | Return Points Win % | 48% (43/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrianjafitrimo vs Urgesi Match Preview :
- In recent performances, Andrianjafitrimo has won 36.39% of points on their second serve, whereas Urgesi managed to secure a higher 41.35%. Does this give Urgesi an edge in predictions? Yes, as second serve success is closely linked to match outcomes.
- Assessing return game performance, Andrianjafitrimo excels, capturing 57.21% of opponents' second serve points compared to Urgesi's 52.06%. Similarly, with first serve returns, Andrianjafitrimo stands at 36.05%, slightly ahead of Urgesi's 32.33%.
- When under pressure during breakpoints, Andrianjafitrimo saves 47.85% while Urgesi achieves 51.84%. Could this indicate Urgesi's potential for resilience? Possibly, it suggests a tactical edge in crucial moments.
- Over the past year, Andrianjafitrimo has an impressive 71.21% win rate (47 wins, 19 losses), outshining Urgesi's 54.1% (33 wins, 28 losses). Does this suggest greater overall consistency for Andrianjafitrimo? Most likely, yes.
- Andrianjafitrimo's best surface is Hard, boasting a 66% win rate, while Urgesi prefers I.hard at 63%. Which player adapts better across surfaces? Here, it's Andrianjafitrimo on Hard courts with a clear win advantage.
- Focusing on the level of play, Andrianjafitrimo won 73.02% of matches in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, whereas Urgesi's record stands at 56.36%. Does this imply higher performance levels for Andrianjafitrimo? Certainly, indicating competitive strength.
- Examining opponent quality, Andrianjafitrimo has faced opponents with an average rank of 349.52, compared to Urgesi's 414.26. What does this say about experience against tough competition? It favors Andrianjafitrimo with a stronger profile of adversaries.
- In deciding sets, Andrianjafitrimo has a win percentage of 62%, while Urgesi secures 52%. Is Andrianjafitrimo more reliable in tighter scenarios? Indeed, pointing to mental fortitude in critical set scenarios.
- Looking at breakpoint conversion, Andrianjafitrimo converts 39.38% of opportunities, with Urgesi converting a higher 46.76%. Which player capitalizes more effectively during breakpoints? Urgesi slightly leads in seizing chances.
Editorial Prediction (June 2, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match sees two competitors with contrasting strengths: Andrianjafitrimo's consistent success in matches over the past year, superior return game, and experience against stronger opponents against Urgesi's slightly better second serve efficiency, pressure handling, and breakpoint conversion.
While Urgesi performed well under pressure and has demonstrated a proficiency in converting breakpoints, Andrianjafitrimo shows overall consistency and adaptability across various match situations, particularly on hard courts.
Considering all performance metrics, Andrianjafitrimo seems more likely to win this match given their robust track record, ability to handle high-pressure scenarios, and stronger opponent experience. However, with Urgesi's ability to convert break opportunities, matches can sway unexpectedly if they capitalize on key moments.
Andrianjafitrimo vs Urgesi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
2 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Oleksandra Oliynykova
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
109)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
0
Aces
0
17
Double Faults
13
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
26%
(
8 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
8 of
37)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
60 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
63%
(
78 of
124)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
13
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
37%
(
17 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
54%
(
67 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
102)
113
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Federica Urgesi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Federica Urgesi
45%
(
10 of
22)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Federica Urgesi
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Kristina Kroitor
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Federica Urgesi
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
16
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Federica Urgesi
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federica Urgesi
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (330/240) | Win/Loss | 48% (64/70) |
| 56% (752/582) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (154/165) |
| 53% (6363/5683) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1535/1528) |
| 66% (183/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 54% (123/103) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (38/51) |
| 37% (21/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 38% (3/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 439 | Aces Total | 193 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2258 | Total Double Faults | 437 |
| 1:42:14 | Average Match Time | 1:40:22 |
| 510.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.17 |
| 63% (21923/34736) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5251/8457) |
| 60% (13122/21849) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3118/5251) |
| 43% (5500/12887) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1411/3206) |
| 49% (2422/4949) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (503/1066) |
| 49% (17234/35445) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3903/8471) |
| 25% (5/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 31% (4/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (276/197) | Challenger W/L | 45% (45/55) |
| 70% (45/19) | Futures W/L | 61% (19/12) |
| 58% (328/567) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (63/132) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (48/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 53% (103/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 83% (322/268) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (65/51) |
| 17% (322/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (65/14) |
| 25% (248/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |
Andrianjafitrimo vs. Urgesi Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
