Tessah Andrianjafitrimo vs Eunhye Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W L L W W W LH2H: Andrianjafitrimo 1 - 0 Lee
They have played 3 sets in total, with Andrianjafitrimo winning 2 and Lee winning 1. The last match between Andrianjafitrimo and Lee was at the W35 Burnie, 19-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Tessah Andrianjafitrimo getting the victory 6-1 5-7 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tessah Andrianjafitrimo | 1 |
| Eunhye Lee | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Burnie(19-02-2025)
6
1
5
7
7
6
| Andrianjafitrimo | Stats | Lee |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (19-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (11-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 205 | Ranking | 382 |
| 139 | Highest Rank | 382 |
| 26 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 5 |
| 58% (327-233) | Career Total W/L | 63% (198-117) |
| $128,498 | Career Prize Money | $6,603 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Raducanu PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andrianjafitrimo VS Lee H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Eunhye Lee
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Andrianjafitrimo VS Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 3:35:30 | Average Match Time | 3:35:30 |
| 64% (62/97) | 1st Serve % | 63% (70/111) |
| 68% (42/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (41/70) |
| 49% (17/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 47% (52/111) | Return Points Win % | 39% (38/97) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrianjafitrimo vs Lee Match Preview :
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Lee has exhibited exceptional prowess on their second serve, winning 44.82% of points, while Andrianjafitrimo has achieved a respectable 41.76% success rate. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Analyzing recent return game data reveals that Lee has displayed a remarkable ability to win 61.67% of their opponent's second serve points. In comparison, Andrianjafitrimo has attained a slightly lower success rate of 60.03%. When examining first serve returns, Lee has achieved a commendable 43.95%, while Andrianjafitrimo has secured a solid 43.39%. These statistics carry substantial weight in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: In critical moments, Lee has demonstrated remarkable resilience by successfully saving 52.87% of breakpoints during recent encounters. Conversely, Andrianjafitrimo has displayed a slightly lower percentage of 50.45%, making this statistic particularly insightful for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Evaluating performance over the past year, Lee has showcased their dominance by triumphing in 70.15% of matches played (W/L47/20). Equally impressive, Andrianjafitrimo has achieved a commendable winning percentage of 67.35% (W/L33/16). These statistics collectively provide a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Best Surface: Lee's exceptional career win percentage is observed on the challenging I.hard surface, with a remarkable 67% victory rate (W/L8/4). On the contrary, their performance on Clay has been comparatively less successful, securing a 62% win rate (W/L16/10). For Andrianjafitrimo, their greatest career triumphs have taken place on the demanding Hard courts, with a formidable 65% win rate (W/L171/92). Conversely, their performance on I.hard surfaces has been relatively disappointing, achieving only a 38% success rate (W/L21/35).
- Player Level: In the preceding year, Lee has predominantly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments valued at $10K, exhibiting their exceptional skill by winning 81.4% of matches (W/L35/8). Alternatively, Andrianjafitrimo has primarily competed in the more prestigious Challengers/ITF tournaments, surpassing numerous opponents with a commendable 68.09% success rate (W/L32/15). Therefore, when assessing player statistics to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the level of competition they have encountered.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Throughout the past 12 months, Lee has consistently faced opponents with an average rank of 322.45, demonstrating their ability to compete against formidable adversaries. In contrast, Andrianjafitrimo's opponents' average rank stands slightly higher at 368.94.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those keen on live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that in the last 12 months, Lee has emerged victorious in 44% of deciding sets. Astonishingly, Andrianjafitrimo's performance in all matches played on tour has resulted in a remarkable 59% win rate in deciding sets.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance undoubtedly serves as a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to examine current event statistics to assess players in prime form. To obtain a comprehensive understanding, please refer to the section below containing the latest match outcomes within the ongoing event. Furthermore, one must consider that certain players may exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, which significantly impacts outcome predictions.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Lee has capitalized on 48.91% of breakpoints, efficiently seizing opportunities to break their opponents' serve. Similarly, Andrianjafitrimo has displayed a notable 46.48% conversion rate, emphasizing the significance of this statistic in providing valuable in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess a keen interest in statistical models that predict tennis match outcomes, you may find this article to be an excellent starting point. Please note that it caters specifically to the statistical enthusiasts among us.
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
9
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Emily Appleton
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Sarah Iliev
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
0
Aces
0
22
Double Faults
4
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
26%
(
11 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
53%
(
57 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Selena Janicijevic
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
46 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Valentina Ryser
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Emina Bektas
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Amandine Monnot
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
51%
(
35 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
Player
Riya Bhatia
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Eunhye Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Eunhye Lee
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Zongyu Li
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
En Shuo Liang
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Ui Su Jeong
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Eunhye Lee
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Eunhye Lee
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marine Szostak
Player
Eunhye Lee
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Lidia Podgorichani
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Eunhye Lee
Player
Dayeon Back
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (327/233) | Win/Loss | 63% (198/117) |
| 57% (745/566) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (437/267) |
| 53% (6275/5556) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3478/2741) |
| 66% (183/95) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (171/101) |
| 55% (120/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) |
| 37% (21/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (11/6) |
| 43% (3/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 436 | Aces Total | 455 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2184 | Total Double Faults | 748 |
| 1:41:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 507.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.68 |
| 63% (21529/34032) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7357/11704) |
| 60% (12901/21455) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4712/7357) |
| 43% (5395/12577) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1966/4344) |
| 49% (2378/4838) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (835/1645) |
| 49% (16875/34685) | Return Points Win % | 49% (5812/11935) |
| 28% (5/13) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31% (4/9) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 59% (273/192) | Challenger W/L | 54% (60/52) |
| 70% (45/19) | Futures W/L | 69% (137/63) |
| 58% (325/557) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (195/311) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (47/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (22/47) |
| 53% (101/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (33/76) |
| 83% (320/266) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (208/182) |
| 17% (320/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (208/25) |
| 26% (240/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (107/15) |
Andrianjafitrimo vs. Lee Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
