L. Giza
To Win
T. J. Brockmann
To Win
Tessa Johanna Brockmann vs Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W W L W L LH2H: Brockmann 1 - 0 Olsen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Brockmann winning 2 and Olsen winning 1. The last match between Brockmann and Olsen was at the W35 Ystad, 18-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Tessa Johanna Brockmann getting the victory 6-2 1-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tessa Johanna Brockmann | 1 |
| Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Ystad(18-06-2025)
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
6
2
1
6
6
4
| Brockmann | Stats | Olsen |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (23-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (16-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 514 | Ranking | 773 |
| 514 | Highest Rank | 773 |
| 19 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (64-48) | Career Total W/L | 57% (112-84) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
07 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:3:17 | Average Match Time | 2:3:17 |
| 55% (46/83) | 1st Serve % | 64% (49/77) |
| 59% (27/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (31/49) |
| 49% (18/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (10/28) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (4/10) |
| 47% (36/77) | Return Points Win % | 46% (38/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brockmann vs Olsen Match Preview :
- In terms of recent second serve success, Brockmann edges out Olsen with a 40.69% point-win rate compared to Olsen's 37.01%.
- Brockmann showcases a stronger breakpoint-saving ability, successfully saving 53.09% of breakpoints, while Olsen lags behind at 40.95%.
- Interestingly, Olsen is slightly ahead in returning second serves, winning 53.72% of these points against Brockmann's 51.51%.
- Who handles first serve returns better? Olsen does, winning 38.4% compared to Brockmann's 33.98%.
- Both players have similar win percentages over the past year, with Brockmann at 60.87% and Olsen at 60.94%.
- What surface favors each player? Brockmann performs best on Hard surfaces with a 60% win rate, while Olsen excels on Clay with a 62% win rate.
- In terms of competition level, Brockmann has been more active in Challengers/ITF, securing a 55% win rate, whereas Olsen's major play has been in ITF tournaments with a 54.29% win rate.
- Directly, Brockmann has a head-to-head advantage, winning their sole encounter on clay, which ended 6-2, 1-6, 6-4.
- Both players have not faced each other in tiebreakers, leaving this scenario unpredictable.
- Considering match difficulty, Brockmann has faced competitors with an average rank of 372.83, whereas Olsen's opponents have averaged a rank of 335.56.
- In deciding sets, Brockmann holds an advantage, winning 64% of them over the last year compared to Olsen's 53%.
- Finally, when it comes to breakpoint conversion in recent play, Olsen narrowly surpasses Brockmann with a success rate of 40.33% against 39.56%.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the performance metrics, both players possess unique strengths that could sway the match outcome. Brockmann demonstrates stronger consistency in saving breakpoints and defending second serves, while Olsen shows prowess in returning serves and converting breakpoints.
When considering surface preference, Brockmann may face a challenge on Clay, Olsen's favored terrain. However, the key head-to-head victory on this surface may bolster Brockmann's confidence.
Brockmann’s superior performance in deciding sets could prove crucial if the match is tightly contested.
Taking into account their singular direct encounter, with a victory on Clay, along with Brockmann's decisive set record, Brockmann is poised as the likely winner in this matchup. However, Olsen's return skills and breakpoint conversion should not be underestimated, possibly making this a tightly contested affair.
Brockmann vs Olsen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Tessa Johanna Brockmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
114)
2
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
97
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Anastasiia Firman
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Lola Giza
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
81
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alisa Oktiabreva
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
50 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Emily Sartz-Lunde
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
41%
(
27 of
66)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
92%
(
11 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
60%
(
56 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Cindy Langlais
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Kulbiej
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (64/48) | Win/Loss | 57% (112/84) |
| 55% (143/115) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (250/198) |
| 53% (1281/1157) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2143/1908) |
| 60% (21/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) |
| 57% (36/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (90/57) |
| 50% (7/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 160 | Aces Total | 131 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 361 | Total Double Faults | 369 |
| 1:41:26 | Average Match Time | 1:8:13 |
| 380.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 422.06 |
| 59% (3932/6647) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5595/8466) |
| 61% (2407/3932) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (3132/5595) |
| 47% (1274/2715) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1170/2871) |
| 48% (382/798) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (588/1109) |
| 46% (3013/6551) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4055/8389) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 50% (26/26) | Challenger W/L | 57% (34/26) |
| 63% (38/22) | Futures W/L | 57% (77/58) |
| 59% (64/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (112/196) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (20/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (18/34) |
| 60% (21/35) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (30/56) |
| 86% (64/55) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (108/98) |
| 14% (64/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (108/10) |
| 19% (48/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (88/14) |
Brockmann vs. Olsen Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
