M. Landaluce
To Win
T. Atmane
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L W WForm
L L L W W W W W W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Atmane winning 3 and Schoolkate winning 2. The last match between Atmane and Schoolkate was at the Guangzhou Challenger, 04-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Hard, with Terence Atmane getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Terence Atmane | 1 |
Tristan Schoolkate | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Guangzhou Challenger(04-05-2025)
Atmane | Stats | Schoolkate |
---|---|---|
56% (23-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (29-18) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
123 | Ranking | 106 |
118 | Highest Rank | 106 |
23 | Age | 24 |
- | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 5 |
62% (227-142) | Career Total W/L | 59% (198-139) |
$363,910 | Career Prize Money | $458,850 |
2 | YTD Titles | 2 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
19 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(4) |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
56 of
79)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 2 |
29 | Games Won | 28 |
17 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
2:4:30 | Average Match Time | 2:4:30 |
69% (118/172) | 1st Serve % | 61% (100/163) |
75% (88/118) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (75/100) |
48% (26/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (32/63) |
63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
34% (56/163) | Return Points Win % | 34% (58/172) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the realm of tennis match predictions, second serve performance is a pivotal metric. In the past six months, Atmane has managed to win 47.8% of points on their second serve, whereas Schoolkate trails slightly behind with 44.21%. This statistic is vital for predicting match outcomes with a high degree of accuracy. Additionally, analyzing return game statistics reveals that Schoolkate has won 48.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Atmane secured 44.74%. In terms of first serve returns, both players display proficiency with Atmane at 23.7% and Schoolkate closely following at 22.72%. These return stats offer insight into which player could have the upper hand in this head-to-head matchup.
Breaking down performance under pressure, Atmane shows a slight edge by saving 60.66% of breakpoints compared to Schoolkate's 59.42%. This efficiency in handling pressure situations is invaluable for in-game betting predictions. When considering overall performance over the last year, Schoolkate holds a stronger match-winning percentage of 60.24% compared to Atmane's 55.56%, indicating a broader prediction overview for their encounters.
Surface preference plays a crucial role in performance, with Atmane achieving their best career win percentage on Hard surfaces at 65% and struggling on Grass with a 33% win rate. Conversely, Schoolkate excels on Grass with a 68% win percentage, while having their lowest success on Clay at 52%. The level of tournaments both players frequent is also notable; over the past year, Atmane has a win rate of 59.09% in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, whereas Schoolkate boasts a superior 63.93% win rate.
Head-to-head statistics reveal that Schoolkate leads with one winning encounter against Atmane. In their past matchup at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, Schoolkate emerged victorious in a grueling three-set match. The match lasted an average of 2:28:6, underscoring the closely contested nature of their meetings. Additionally, in deciding sets over the last year, Schoolkate has performed better, winning 59% compared to Atmane's 46%, a critical factor if the match extends to a deciding set.
Considering recent form, Atmane has an edge in breakpoint conversion, successfully converting 32% of opportunities compared to Schoolkate's 26.76%. This statistic is crucial for making live betting decisions during the match. Finally, weighing all these factors, including past performances and current form, Schoolkate appears to have a slight advantage over Atmane in this upcoming match, increasing their likelihood of securing another victory.
Atmane vs Schoolkate Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Hugo Gaston
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alexander Blockx
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Jack Pinnington Jones
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
130)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
64 of
130)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Zachary Svajda
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
9
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
21%
(
7 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
13
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
9
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
53 of
71)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (227/142) | Win/Loss | 59% (198/139) |
59% (515/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (442/348) |
53% (4506/4018) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4038/3665) |
65% (177/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (132/93) |
56% (37/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (24/24) |
41% (9/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (15/10) |
40% (4/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 69% (27/12) |
0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
2113 | Aces Total | 2313 |
0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
1235 | Total Double Faults | 1400 |
1:40:56 | Average Match Time | 1:46:3 |
375.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.15 |
59% (15587/26201) | 1st Serve % | 60% (14237/23588) |
72% (11231/15587) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (10547/14237) |
52% (5554/10614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4515/9351) |
43% (963/2242) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (889/2255) |
38% (9772/25715) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9179/23929) |
43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 40% (6/9) |
57% (12/9) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
44% (11/14) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (6/8) |
63% (92/55) | Challenger W/L | 57% (94/70) |
65% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 64% (89/50) |
62% (223/360) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (192/328) |
0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
58% (87/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (74/146) |
54% (72/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (63/107) |
86% (232/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (175/157) |
14% (232/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (175/18) |
21% (136/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (162/41) |