Terence Atmane vs Otto Virtanen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L L L L
Form
L L W L W L L W L LHead-to-head: Atmane 0 - 1 Virtanen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Atmane winning 0 and Virtanen winning 2. The last match between Atmane and Virtanen was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 15-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Otto Virtanen getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(15-02-2025)
6
4
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Otto Virtanen
Player
Terence Atmane
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
9
Games Won
13
3
Aces (Total)
2
2
Total Double Faults
1
1:31:48
Average Match Time
1:31:48
69% (46/67)
1st Serve %
67% (51/76)
67% (31/46)
1st Serve Win %
73% (37/51)
43% (9/21)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (12/25)
13% (1/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
75% (3/4)
36% (27/76)
Return Points Win %
40% (27/67)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Terence Atmane vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Terence Atmane 0 - 1 Otto Virtanen
Recent Performance Analysis: In the past six months, Atmane has exhibited an impressive second serve performance, triumphing in 53.66% of their second serve points. In contrast, Virtanen has achieved success in 49.63% of similar points. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistical field and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Insights: Recent return game statistics demonstrate that Atmane has effectively seized 50.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen boasts a slightly higher percentage of 50.88%. Referring to first serve returns, Atmane has achieved a commendable 27.48%, while Virtanen stands at 26%. These figures hold significant correlation in determining the favored player in their impending head-to-head matchup.
Analysis Under Pressure: When the stakes are high, Atmane has showcased resilience and saved an impressive 56.21% of breakpoints in their recent form. Virtanen, on the other hand, has displayed an even greater ability to handle pressure, saving 59.24% of breakpoints. This serves as a valuable indicator for in-game betting predictions.
Overall Performance Overview: Examining their performances over the past year, Atmane has emerged victorious in 53.52% of matches played (W/L: 38/33). Similarly, Virtanen has achieved success in 58.21% of their matches (W/L: 39/28). Considering these statistics provides a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head encounter.
Favorable Surfaces: Atmane excels on Hard, attaining an impressive career win percentage of 65% (W/L: 163/86). In contrast, their performance on Grass surfaces has been less favorable, with a win percentage of 33% (W/L: 2/4). Virtanen, on the other hand, exhibits utmost proficiency on I.hard, triumphing in 70% of matches played (W/L: 120/51). However, their performance on Hard surfaces has been relatively weaker, standing at a win percentage of 46% (W/L: 21/25).
Player Level: Over the previous year, Atmane has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments valued at more than $10,000, achieving success in 56.41% of their matches (W/L: 22/17). Similarly, Virtanen has primarily contested in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10,000, securing victories in 69.7% of matches (W/L: 23/10). When comparing the players' statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have competed.
Opponent Quality Statistics: In the past 12 months, Atmane has faced challengers with an average ranking of 207.86, while Virtanen's opponents held an average ranking of 236.15.
Deciding Set Performance: For those intrigued by live predictions and betting opportunities, should this match extend to a deciding set, Atmane has convert a considerable 47% of deciding sets within the last year. Virtanen has also displayed prowess in this area, successfully winning 57% of all matches played on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While analyzing player performances from the past proves advantageous in forecasting tennis matches, it is crucial to also observe current event statistics once a tournament is underway. These figures offer insights into the form displayed by the players on the day. For current event performance, please refer to the section below (in case of having participated in the ongoing event). Furthermore, some players showcase enhanced capabilities in specific tournaments, and this factor should be given due consideration when predicting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion: Examining recent form, Atmane has efficaciously converted 40% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Virtanen has seized 32.74% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular statistic proves highly impactful in in-game live betting tips, especially when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in delving deeper into models designed to predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Intended for avid statisticians only).
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
15
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Terence Atmane
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
40 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Terence Atmane
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Terence Atmane
83%
(
66 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Fajing Sun
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Terence Atmane
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
12
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Terence Atmane
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Clement Chidekh
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
10
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Otto Virtanen
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Terence Atmane
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Otto Virtanen
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Korda
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
19
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Otto Virtanen
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (209/134)
Win/Loss
59% (208/147)
59% (475/331)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (480/365)
53% (4163/3696)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4230/3920)
64% (163/90)
Hard Win/Loss
44% (23/29)
56% (35/27)
Clay Win/Loss
46% (44/52)
41% (9/13)
Indoor Hard W/L
69% (125/56)
33% (2/4)
Grass Win/Loss
62% (16/10)
0.5
Aces Per Game
0.65
1904
Aces Total
2576
0.3
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
1139
Total Double Faults
1174
1:40:6
Average Match Time
1:30:35
381.12
Average Opponent Rank
391.52
60% (14342/24068)
1st Serve %
59% (14558/24562)
72% (10297/14342)
1st Serve Win %
73% (10604/14558)
52% (5092/9726)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (4918/10003)
44% (904/2067)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (935/2367)
38% (8989/23572)
Return Points Win %
38% (9442/24775)
46% (6/7)
Slam W/L
62% (16/10)
58% (11/8)
Masters W/L
17% (1/5)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
47% (8/9)
44% (11/14)
Main Tour W/L
35% (11/20)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (75/49)
Challenger W/L
60% (89/60)
65% (106/56)
Futures W/L
66% (83/43)
61% (205/336)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (202/340)
0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
30% (3/10)
57% (76/134)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (78/142)
52% (63/122)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (65/124)
85% (218/186)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (202/172)
15% (218/32)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (202/29)
19% (124/23)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (153/34)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
