K. Majchrzak
To Win
T. Atmane
To Win
Terence Atmane vs Oliver Tarvet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W W L L
Form
W W W W L W W W W LHead-To-Head: Atmane 0 - 1 Tarvet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Atmane winning 0 and Tarvet winning 2. The last match between Atmane and Tarvet was at the Wimbledon - London, 23-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Oliver Tarvet getting the victory 6-1 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Terence Atmane | 0 |
| Oliver Tarvet | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(23-06-2025)
Oliver Tarvet
Terence Atmane
6
1
7
6
| Atmane | Stats | Tarvet |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (23-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 86% (12-2) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 124 | Ranking | 733 |
| 118 | Highest Rank | 624 |
| 23 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 5 |
| 61% (227-144) | Career Total W/L | 79% (53-14) |
| $363,910 | Career Prize Money | $99,000 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lajal VS Lemaitre PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kirchheimer VS Nanda PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:43:0 | Average Match Time | 1:43:0 |
| 67% (50/75) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) |
| 68% (34/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (32/39) |
| 32% (8/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 0% (0/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 25% (15/60) | Return Points Win % | 44% (33/75) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Atmane vs Tarvet Match Preview :
- Atmane has a slight edge in recent second serve performance, securing 47.1% of points compared to Tarvet's 43.33%. Does this give Atmane a significant advantage? Possibly, since second serve efficiency often impacts match outcomes.
- Regarding return games, Atmane is ahead on second serve returns, winning 44.94% of points, whereas Tarvet wins 40.1%. However, Tarvet performs better on first serve returns with 29.13% compared to Atmane's 23.99%. Which stat matters more for this matchup? Both are crucial, but Atmane’s edge on second serve returns may be more predictive of overall match success.
- Under pressure, Atmane excels, saving 62.65% of breakpoints, contrasting Tarvet's 46.38%. This resilience could prove vital in tight situations.
- Over the past year, Atmane has won 56% of their matches. In contrast, Tarvet impressively won 83.33% of their matches, indicating a higher success rate overall.
- Both players favor hard courts, with Atmane holding a 65% win rate and Tarvet an 81% win rate. Does the surface preference provide Tarvet a clear edge? It seems so, particularly on hard courts.
- Atmane competes primarily in higher-level Challenger tournaments, while Tarvet dominates in Futures events, winning a remarkable 83.33% of matches. How does this difference affect predictions? Tarvet's performance against possibly weaker competition may skew win percentages.
- Considering opponent quality, Atmane faces tougher challenges with opponents averaging rank 236.17 versus Tarvet's 517.94, potentially indicating a tougher path to victories.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, both players have comparable records, Atmane at 49% and Tarvet at 50%, suggesting a balanced contest in tight situations.
- With break point conversion, Tarvet leads slightly with a 33.33% conversion rate compared to Atmane's 32.5%. Can this small difference be pivotal? Occasionally, in closely fought matches, yes.
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming matchup showcases two players with distinct strengths and competitive edges in different areas of their game.
Atmane's superior performance in second serve points and break point saving suggest resilience and ability to secure points under pressure. These factors, combined with the quality of their opponents, could provide Atmane with a strategic edge.
However, Tarvet's remarkable overall win percentage and strong results on hard courts might present a formidable challenge for Atmane, particularly if the match takes place on their favored surface.
While Atmane's experience against stronger opponents and second serve prowess are noteworthy, Tarvet's overall winning momentum could be decisive.
Based on the overall analysis of strengths, weaknesses, and recent form in competitive play, Tarvet is slightly favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Atmane vs Tarvet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Oliver Tarvet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Oliver Tarvet
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
100
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Leandro Riedi
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
16 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Alexander Blockx
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
110
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Alexis Galarneau
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Oliver Tarvet
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
45%
(
13 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
59%
(
23 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
40
|
3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Toby Samuel
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Alfredo Perez
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (227/144) | Win/Loss | 79% (53/14) |
| 59% (516/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 74% (111/39) |
| 53% (4525/4049) | Games Win/Loss | 60% (817/540) |
| 65% (177/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 81% (43/10) |
| 56% (37/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (9/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2124 | Aces Total | 217 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1247 | Total Double Faults | 119 |
| 1:40:59 | Average Match Time | 1:40:36 |
| 377.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 387.73 |
| 60% (15697/26364) | 1st Serve % | 58% (2098/3640) |
| 72% (11305/15697) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (1511/2098) |
| 52% (5577/10667) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (851/1542) |
| 43% (964/2254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (213/419) |
| 38% (9811/25859) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1661/3800) |
| 40% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 57% (12/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (11/14) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (92/56) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 79% (49/13) |
| 62% (223/362) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 82% (50/61) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 58% (88/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 73% (11/15) |
| 53% (72/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 73% (11/15) |
| 85% (233/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (49/46) |
| 15% (233/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (49/2) |
| 20% (137/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 39% (18/7) |
Atmane vs. Tarvet Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
