Terence Atmane vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W W L L
Form
W W W W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Atmane 1 - 0 Gigante
They have played 3 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Gigante winning 1. The last match between Atmane and Gigante was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 16-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Terence Atmane getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Terence Atmane | 1 |
| Matteo Gigante | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Nottingham 2 Challenger(16-06-2025)
Terence Atmane
Matteo Gigante
4
6
6
4
6
4
| Atmane | Stats | Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (23-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (21-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 124 | Ranking | 133 |
| 118 | Highest Rank | 130 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 9 | Titles | 6 |
| 61% (227-144) | Career Total W/L | 58% (163-117) |
| $363,910 | Career Prize Money | $478,985 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:57:48 | Average Match Time | 1:57:48 |
| 68% (56/82) | 1st Serve % | 60% (59/98) |
| 79% (44/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (42/59) |
| 54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 15% (2/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 35% (34/98) | Return Points Win % | 29% (24/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Atmane vs Gigante Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Atmane edges out Gigante in second serve points won, boasting a win rate of 46.24% compared to Gigante's 44.01%. Is this an indicator of Atmane's slight serve advantage? Yes, it suggests a marginal edge.
- Return Game Stats: Gigante excels in returning, winning 48.62% of opponent's second serve points in recent form, outshining Atmane's 45.19%. On first serve returns, Gigante maintains a lead with 26.59% compared to Atmane's 23.97%.
- Pressure Play: Atmane excels under pressure, saving 62.3% of breakpoints, while Gigante has a 50.51% save rate. Does this suggest Atmane remains steadfast in crucial moments? Indeed, Atmane seems more resilient.
- Overall Performance: Over the last year, Gigante's match win percentage is slightly higher at 57.38% compared to Atmane's 56%. However, both players are comparably strong.
- Preferred Surfaces: Grass suits Gigante, winning 71% of matches, while Hard courts favor Atmane, with a 65% win rate. Interestingly, Atmane struggles on Grass, matching a mere 25% win rate.
- Player Level: At the Challenger/ITF level over the past year, Atmane has a higher win rate of 60.38% versus Gigante's 56.41%. Does Atmane's experience at this level offer an advantage? Possibly, as Atmane has more wins.
- Opponent Quality: Gigante usually faces tougher opponents with an average ranking of 196.8, whereas Atmane competes against a lower average rank of 232.15. Does this indicate Gigante is more challenged? Yes, facing stronger players may boost Gigante's experience.
- Deciding Set Acumen: Gigante shines in three-set matches, conquering 71% of deciding sets, while Atmane stands at 49%. Who is the formidable force in tight matches? Gigante shows superior grit.
- Break Point Conversion: Atmane slightly surpasses Gigante in break point conversion with 33.88% compared to 32.37%. Could this give Atmane a critical edge in tight games? It strengthens their breakpoint potential.
Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the recent performance stats, two patterns emerge: Atmane boasts a slightly better second serve performance and breakpoint conversion rate, which might be crucial in closing out tight games.
However, Gigante excels in return games and has demonstrated significant resilience in deciding sets, indicating a strong capacity to navigate high-pressure scenarios.
Considering these strengths, alongside Gigante's superior record against tougher opponents and preference for grass, the scales seem to tip slightly in Gigante's favor.
Overall, while the competition is closely matched, Gigante's edge in returning and deciding set performance suggests they are most likely to prevail in this upcoming match.
Atmane vs Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
9
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
85)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
76 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
121)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
42 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (227/144) | Win/Loss | 58% (163/117) |
| 59% (516/360) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (370/292) |
| 53% (4525/4049) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3262/2993) |
| 65% (177/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (56/23) |
| 56% (37/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (93/65) |
| 41% (9/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26% (9/25) |
| 33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2124 | Aces Total | 888 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1247 | Total Double Faults | 939 |
| 1:40:59 | Average Match Time | 1:35:14 |
| 377.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.5 |
| 60% (15697/26364) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11269/18973) |
| 72% (11305/15697) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (7696/11269) |
| 52% (5577/10667) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3814/7704) |
| 43% (964/2254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (880/2025) |
| 38% (9811/25859) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7885/19211) |
| 40% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 58% (14/10) |
| 57% (12/9) | Masters W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 44% (11/14) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 62% (92/56) | Challenger W/L | 57% (105/79) |
| 65% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 73% (37/14) |
| 62% (223/362) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (158/269) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 58% (88/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (49/86) |
| 53% (72/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (54/96) |
| 85% (233/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (170/136) |
| 15% (233/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (170/32) |
| 20% (137/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (110/25) |
Atmane vs. Gigante Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
