M. Landaluce
To Win
T. Atmane
To Win
Terence Atmane vs Ilya Ivashka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L L L W W
Form
W W W W W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Atmane 1 - 0 Ivashka
They have played 3 sets in total, with Atmane winning 2 and Ivashka winning 1. The last match between Atmane and Ivashka was at the Wuxi Challenger, 06-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Terence Atmane getting the victory 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Terence Atmane | 1 |
| Ilya Ivashka | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wuxi Challenger(06-05-2025)
Terence Atmane
Ilya Ivashka
7
6
4
6
6
2
| Atmane | Stats | Ivashka |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (23-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (10-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 123 | Ranking | 854 |
| 118 | Highest Rank | 40 |
| 23 | Age | 31 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 9 |
| 62% (227-142) | Career Total W/L | 59% (368-252) |
| $363,910 | Career Prize Money | $2,037,508 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Wang VS Gauff PREDICTION Grass
Berlin Ladies Open - Berlin wta
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Michelsen VS Medvedev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
20 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Terence Atmane
Player
Ilya Ivashka
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:33:46 | Average Match Time | 2:33:46 |
| 66% (60/91) | 1st Serve % | 64% (72/113) |
| 78% (47/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (48/72) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (19/41) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 41% (46/113) | Return Points Win % | 33% (30/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Atmane vs Ivashka Match Preview :
- **Second Serve Performance:** Over the past six months, Ivashka secured 47.52% of points on second serve, narrowly outpacing Atmane's 47.5%, a stat crucial for anticipating match outcomes.
- **Return Game Stats:** Ivashka has captured 47.01% of points on opponents' second serves and 34.22% on first serves, compared to Atmane’s 44.61% and 23.78%, suggesting advantaged prediction for Ivashka in head-to-head matchups.
- **Under Pressure Analysis:** Atmane proves more effective under pressure with a 61.11% success rate in saving breakpoints, versus Ivashka's 50%, offering insight for in-game betting strategies.
- **Performance Overview:** Ivashka boasts a 75% win rate in the last year (9-3), whereas Atmane holds 55.56% (40-32), influencing predictions about overall head-to-head clashes.
- **Best Surface:** Ivashka has a career 63% win rate on Hard courts, while Atmane excels on the same surface with a 65% win rate, but struggles on grass with 33%.
- **Player Level:** Ivashka contested primarily in lower-level tournaments, winning 75% (9-3), while Atmane played primarily in Challengers, winning 60% (27-18), pointing to differences in competitive exposure.
- **Opponent Quality Stats:** Ivashka’s opponents had an average rank of 465.83, significantly lower than Atmane’s opponents, ranked on average at 220.81, providing context on match predictions.
- **Deciding Set Performance:** Ivashka has won 50% of deciding sets in the past year, slightly ahead of Atmane’s 46%, valuable for live match predictions.
- **Break Point Conversion:** Ivashka has a higher breakpoint conversion rate of 43.75% compared to Atmane’s 32.43%, crucial for in-game betting insights.
---
**Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2023):** Based on the comparative analysis, Ivashka's superior performance in second serve retention, return games, and breakpoint conversion presents him as the likely favorite in this upcoming match. Despite Atmane's impressive ability to handle breakpoints and compete against higher-ranked opponents, Ivashka's consistent outcomes on Hard surfaces and overall match win rates suggest a stronger edge in head-to-head performance. Thus, prediction models slightly favor Ivashka to emerge victorious in this clash.
Atmane vs Ivashka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Terence Atmane Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Arthur Fery
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
33 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Terence Atmane
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Terence Atmane
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
58 of
81)
3
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Terence Atmane
59%
(
56 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
114)
114
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Terence Atmane
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
93 of
153)
9
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
70 of
93)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
28 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
55 of
153)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
7-6(3) 6-7(11) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Hugo Gaston
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilya Ivashka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Ilya Ivashka
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Kaylan Bigun
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
39%
(
29 of
74)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Ilya Ivashka
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Ilya Ivashka
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Egor Agafonov
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (227/142) | Win/Loss | 59% (368/252) |
| 59% (515/356) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (855/631) |
| 53% (4506/4018) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7568/6593) |
| 65% (177/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (201/123) |
| 56% (37/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (43/42) |
| 41% (9/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (103/68) |
| 40% (4/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (21/19) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2113 | Aces Total | 2680 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1235 | Total Double Faults | 1430 |
| 1:40:56 | Average Match Time | 1:21:15 |
| 375.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.37 |
| 59% (15587/26201) | 1st Serve % | 62% (22517/36032) |
| 72% (11231/15587) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (16035/22517) |
| 52% (5554/10614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6706/13502) |
| 43% (963/2242) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1495/3594) |
| 38% (9772/25715) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14435/36547) |
| 43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 49% (24/25) |
| 57% (12/9) | Masters W/L | 48% (21/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 44% (11/14) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (86/67) |
| 63% (92/55) | Challenger W/L | 60% (119/81) |
| 65% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 69% (107/48) |
| 62% (223/360) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (344/573) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 58% (87/149) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (100/208) |
| 54% (72/134) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (104/198) |
| 86% (232/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (349/304) |
| 14% (232/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (349/45) |
| 21% (136/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (270/64) |
Atmane vs. Ivashka Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
