Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tennys Sandgren vs Mikael Ymer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Ymer analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Mikael Ymer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Ymer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ymer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ymer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Ymer winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Ymer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 104/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Ymer has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sandgren winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 4 and Ymer winning 1. The last match between Sandgren and Ymer was at the Hamburg European Open - Hamburg, 19-09-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:46:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Ymer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sandgren winning 1 times and Ymer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 1, and Ymer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.11 while Ymer has played against players with an average rank of 190.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ymer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 30.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ymer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 2 - 0 Ymer
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
307
Rank
50
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (420-324)
Career Total W/L
63% (277-165)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$1,465,685
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Mikael Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:46:25 | 0:46:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (50/67) | 60% (38/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (35/50) | 68% (26/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 44% (11/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (26/63) | 34% (23/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Mikael Ymer
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Mikael Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/238) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.89 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 221 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (961/1606) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (747/961) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (329/645) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (47/146) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1620) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Mikael Ymer
66%
(
115 of
174)
1st Serve %
60%
(
87 of
144)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
71 of
115)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
73 of
174)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
62 of
144)
163
Total Points Won
155
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Taylor Fritz
67%
(
97 of
145)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
123)
9
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
0
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
54 of
145)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
123)
133
Total Points Won
135
|
3-6 2-6 6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Alex Molcan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
18 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Mikael Ymer
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
76 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Liam Broady
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
8
10
Double Faults
3
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikael Ymer
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Mikael Ymer
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Mikael Ymer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
114)
109
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Mikael Ymer
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
84%
(
36 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
39
Total Points Won
38
|
6-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandgren Vs Ymer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
