Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tennys Sandgren vs Brayden Schnur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Schnur analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Brayden Schnur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Schnur has won 47.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schnur has won 48.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 30% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schnur has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Schnur winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Schnur has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 11/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Schnur has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sandgren winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 6 and Schnur winning 0. The last match between Sandgren and Schnur was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 03-11-2017, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Schnur have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sandgren winning 0 times and Schnur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 1, and Schnur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.11 while Schnur has played against players with an average rank of 306.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schnur has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 30.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schnur has converted 15.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 3 - 0 Schnur
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
876
Rank
92
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (420-324)
Career Total W/L
52% (221-200)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$240,710
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Brayden Schnur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 38 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:26 | 0:47:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (77/121) | 67% (64/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (55/77) | 56% (36/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (26/44) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (45/95) | 33% (40/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-1 7-6(5) |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tennys Sandgren | Brayden Schnur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/238) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.89 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 221 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (961/1606) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (747/961) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (329/645) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 32% (47/146) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1620) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Brayden Schnur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Brayden Schnur
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
8
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Skander Mansouri
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Clement Chidekh
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
57%
(
75 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
17
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
66 of
90)
60%
(
34 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
30%
(
40 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
136)
138
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(8) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Brayden Schnur
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
7
Aces
7
13
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(11) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Brayden Schnur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Brayden Schnur
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Maxime Cressy
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
7
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
19
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandgren Vs Schnur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
