Tennys Sandgren vs John Millman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Millman analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs John Millman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 51.07% of points on his second serve, while Millman has won 53.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Millman has won 63.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.3% and 27.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Millman has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Millman winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10). Millman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 269/ 169), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 39/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21), where as Millman has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sandgren winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Sandgren winning 4 and Millman winning 5. The last match between Sandgren and Millman was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 09-03-2022, Q3, Hard with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sandgren and Millman have played a deciding set 3 times, with Sandgren winning 1 times and Millman 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 6 tiebreaks against each other with Sandgren winning 3, and Millman 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.11 while Millman has played against players with an average rank of 122.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Millman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 30.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Millman has converted 41.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 1 - 2 Millman
16
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
11
Minor
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
627
Rank
33
High
34
Age
R
Plays
20
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
7
Minor
Form
56% (420-324)
Career Total W/L
59% (452-320)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$2,256,263
Career Prize Money
$3,141,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Tennys Sandgren | John Millman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
Games Won | 48 | 55 |
Aces (Total) | 30 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 11 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:40:48 | 2:40:48 |
1st Serve % | 61% (207/342) | 61% (197/321) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (148/207) | 77% (152/197) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (70/135) | 54% (67/124) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 28% (9/32) |
Return Points W% | 32% (102/321) | 36% (124/342) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (3/6) |
Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(3) 7-6(8) 7-6(5) |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
John Millman
58%
(
73 of
125)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
41 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
35 of
120)
119
Total Points Won
126
|
||||
7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-0 |
John Millman
Player
Tennys Sandgren
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
63 of
106)
8
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
4-6 6-3 7-6(3) |
John Millman
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tennys Sandgren | John Millman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 50% (1/1) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 50% (2/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/238) | 50% (19/19) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (1/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.89 | 0.28 |
Aces Total | 221 | 5 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.06 |
DFs Total | 58 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:49 | 1:26:30 |
Avg Opp Rank | 300.8 | 137 |
1st Serve % | 60% (961/1606) | 63% (77/122) |
1st Serve W% | 78% (747/961) | 61% (47/77) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (329/645) | 53% (24/45) |
BPs Won% Total | 32% (47/146) | 42% (5/12) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (575/1620) | 39% (45/115) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H |
view more
John Millman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Alex Molcan
Player
John Millman
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John Millman
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Stefano Travaglia
Player
John Millman
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
16
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
John Millman
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
John Millman
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniil Medvedev
Player
John Millman
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
103
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Millman
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
116 of
171)
1st Serve %
62%
(
105 of
170)
9
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
90 of
116)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
75 of
105)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
51 of
171)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
57 of
170)
177
Total Points Won
164
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
John Millman
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Millman
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
John Millman
Player
Christopher O'Connell
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more