Tennys Sandgren vs Dominic Stephan Stricker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sandgren vs Stricker analysis and find out who is favored!
Tennys Sandgren vs Dominic Stephan Stricker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sandgren has won 50.15% of points on his second serve, while Stricker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sandgren, in recent form, has won 47.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stricker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.13% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sandgren has saved 60.53% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stricker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sandgren has won 52% of matches played (W/L 26/ 24), with Stricker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 88/ 80). Stricker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Stricker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 279.94 while Stricker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sandgren has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stricker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sandgren has converted 31.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stricker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sandgren 0 - 0 Stricker
16
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tennys Sandgren | Dominic Stephan Stricker |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (8/6) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (21/13) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (196/171) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 1.01 | N/A |
Aces Total | 181 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.16 | N/A |
DFs Total | 28 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:52 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 317.07 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 62% (686/1107) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 78% (537/686) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (225/421) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (32/95) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 34% (387/1130) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (8/14) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 17% (1/6) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | N/A |
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Trevor Svajda
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
105)
3
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
100
|
0-6 7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Tennys Sandgren
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
14
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
51 of
59)
74%
(
26 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
17 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
23 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(10) 7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Henri Squire
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
19
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
14 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more
Dominic Stephan Stricker Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available