Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Sandra Samir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Samir analysis and find out who is favored!
Tena Lukas vs Sandra Samir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 41.85% of points on his second serve, while Samir has won 48.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 59.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samir has won 57.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.52% and 43.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 48.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samir has saved 49.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 51/ 30), with Samir winning 65.28% (W/L 47/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 385/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Samir has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 195/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.75% of matches (W/L 51/ 29), where as Samir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lukas winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lukas winning 1 and Samir winning 2. The last match between Lukas and Samir was at the W25 Vrnjacka Banja, 19-08-2021, Second, Clay with Sandra Samir getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Samir have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lukas winning 0 times and Samir 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 0, and Samir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.56 while Samir has played against players with an average rank of 151.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samir has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 54.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samir has converted 49.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lukas 0 - 1 Samir
208
Rank
200
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
516
Rank
342
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
58% (423-306)
Career Total W/L
64% (426-243)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
75% (18-6)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tena Lukas | Sandra Samir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:0 | 2:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (65/94) | 79% (59/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (33/65) | 66% (39/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (12/29) | 13% (2/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 73% (8/11) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (34/75) | 52% (49/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Sandra Samir
Player
Tena Lukas
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
13%
(
2 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Sandra Samir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 75% (18/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (37/21) | 71% (39/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (275/234) | 58% (290/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 75% (18/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.63 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 157 | 64 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:11 | 1:53:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.63 | 212.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (976/1679) | 55% (820/1489) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (586/976) | 64% (524/820) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (295/703) | 49% (331/669) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (133/234) | 48% (106/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (823/1630) | 48% (720/1491) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 75% (18/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 86% (21/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 14% (21/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (3/0) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tara Wurth
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tena Lukas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Camilla Rosatello
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(0) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Sandra Samir
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Ella Mcdonald
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Sandra Samir
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Liisa Varul
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Gaia Parravicini
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Laura Samsonova
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Alisa Kummel
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Mana Ayukawa
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Samir Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sandra Samir
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
