Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Berfu Cengiz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Cengiz analysis and find out who is favored!
Tena Lukas vs Berfu Cengiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 42.12% of points on his second serve, while Cengiz has won 42.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 59.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cengiz has won 60.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.71% and 35.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 48.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cengiz has saved 49.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 61.25% of matches played (W/L 49/ 31), with Cengiz winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 383/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 88/ 53), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.03% of matches (W/L 49/ 30), where as Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lukas winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lukas winning 0 and Cengiz winning 2. The last match between Lukas and Cengiz was at the W25 Altenkirchen, 20-02-2019, First, Carpet with Berfu Cengiz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Cengiz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lukas winning 0 times and Cengiz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 0, and Cengiz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.57 while Cengiz has played against players with an average rank of 319.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cengiz has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 52.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cengiz has converted 48.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lukas 0 - 1 Cengiz
212
Rank
200
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
323
Rank
228
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
58% (421-306)
Career Total W/L
57% (220-164)
64% (14-8)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$2,824
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tena Lukas | Berfu Cengiz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 41% (32/79) | 75% (39/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 51% (20/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (18/47) | 46% (6/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 58% (7/12) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (26/52) | 56% (44/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
41%
(
32 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
26 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Berfu Cengiz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (14/8) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (33/20) | 51% (21/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (250/220) | 52% (203/187) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.6 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 137 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226 | 324.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (911/1542) | 67% (784/1177) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (544/911) | 61% (477/784) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (266/631) | 44% (174/393) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (119/210) | 49% (76/154) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (749/1500) | 46% (585/1272) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (14/7) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (14/22) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 40% (10/4) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tara Wurth
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tena Lukas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Camilla Rosatello
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(0) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Tena Lukas
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Eleni Christofi
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Radka Zelnickova
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nika Bumbak
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Berfu Cengiz
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Julia Avdeeva
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
119)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
17
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
60%
(
12 of
20)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
67 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Berfu Cengiz
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Berfu Cengiz
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
13
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
55 of
80)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Cengiz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Berfu Cengiz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
