Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Andrea Gamiz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Gamiz analysis and find out who is favored!
Tena Lukas vs Andrea Gamiz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 41.85% of points on his second serve, while Gamiz has won 17.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 59.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gamiz has won 36.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.52% and 30.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 48.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gamiz has saved 28.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 51/ 30), with Gamiz winning 27.78% (W/L 5/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 385/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gamiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 367/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.75% of matches (W/L 51/ 29), where as Gamiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lukas winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lukas winning 2 and Gamiz winning 0. The last match between Lukas and Gamiz was at the Bukfurdo, 24-08-2016, First, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Gamiz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lukas winning 0 times and Gamiz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 1, and Gamiz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.56 while Gamiz has played against players with an average rank of 264.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gamiz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 54.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gamiz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lukas 1 - 0 Gamiz
208
Rank
200
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
855
Rank
244
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
58% (423-306)
Career Total W/L
56% (439-338)
67% (16-8)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$16,320
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tena Lukas | Andrea Gamiz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 41% (31/75) | 78% (69/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (21/31) | 51% (35/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (22/44) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (44/88) | 43% (32/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Tena Lukas
Player
Andrea Gamiz
41%
(
31 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
88)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Andrea Gamiz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (16/8) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (37/21) | 45% (5/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (275/234) | 45% (39/47) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (16/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.63 | 0.07 |
| DFs Total | 157 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.63 | 184.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (976/1679) | 64% (30/47) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (586/976) | 50% (15/30) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (295/703) | 18% (3/17) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (133/234) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (823/1630) | 32% (16/50) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 70% (16/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (16/24) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (3/0) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tara Wurth
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tena Lukas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Camilla Rosatello
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(0) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Gamiz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
