Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Temur Ismailov vs Arpit Sharma Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ismailov vs Sharma analysis and find out who is favored!
Temur Ismailov vs Arpit Sharma Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ismailov has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sharma has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ismailov, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sharma has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ismailov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sharma has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ismailov has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sharma winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ismailov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sharma has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 34% (W/L 24/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ismailov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ismailov winning 2 and Sharma winning 0. The last match between Ismailov and Sharma was at the Pune Challenger, 24-10-2015, Q2 round, Hard with Temur Ismailov getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ismailov and Sharma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ismailov winning 0 times and Sharma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ismailov winning 0, and Sharma 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ismailov has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sharma has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ismailov has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sharma has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ismailov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sharma has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ismailov 1 - 0 Sharma
Ret.
Rank
397
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
49% (136-142)
Career Total W/L
29% (35-85)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Temur Ismailov | Arpit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:31 | 1:5:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) | 53% (35/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 91% (29/32) | 71% (25/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (27/66) | 21% (10/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Temur Ismailov
Player
Arpit Sharma
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
16
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Temur Ismailov | Arpit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Temur Ismailov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Temur Ismailov
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
55
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Borisiouk
Player
Temur Ismailov
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
73)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristian Lozan
Player
Temur Ismailov
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Dostanbek Tashbulatov
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Temur Ismailov
Player
Anton Chekhov
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-7(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Temur Ismailov
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Temur Ismailov
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Temur Ismailov
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Temur Ismailov
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
34
Total Points Won
10
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Pre-Q | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Arpit Sharma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 1-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Ismailov Vs Sharma Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
