Tegan Bush vs Eva Shaw Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Bush's recent performance shows they are winning 34.47% of points on their second serve, compared to Shaw's 43.86%. Could this indicate Shaw's edge in serve reliability?
• When it comes to return games, Bush has won 50.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Shaw has a slightly better rate at 53.85%.
• On first serve returns, Bush's rate is 34.29%, and Shaw is again slightly better at 36.57%. Is this a crucial advantage for Shaw?
• Under pressure, Shaw saves 50% of breakpoints contrasted with Bush’s 45.65%. Could this translate to winning crucial points during the match?
• In terms of match performance over the past year, Bush has won 57.89% of their matches whereas Shaw has a 33.33% win rate. Does Bush have a clear overall advantage?
• Both players perform best on hard courts, Bush with a win rate of 67% and Shaw at 56%.
• Bush plays against lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 377.74) compared to Shaw's tougher competition (average rank of 270.33). Does Shaw have more experience against stronger competition?
• In deciding sets, Bush wins 60% while Shaw wins 50% of the time. Could this endurance factor favor Bush?
• Recent form shows Bush converts 50% of breakpoints, slightly better than Shaw's 45.45% rate.

Editorial Prediction (August 11, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the upcoming match between Bush and Shaw, several key performance metrics offer insights into who might have the upper hand.

Despite Bush's slightly lower second serve performance, they've shown more consistency overall, winning a higher percentage of their matches over the past year.

Shaw, on the other hand, excels under pressure, saving more breakpoints and competing against higher-ranked opponents. This experience might give Shaw a tactical advantage.

However, Bush's superior performance in deciding sets and higher breakpoint conversion rate suggest they can handle critical moments effectively.

Taking these factors into account, Bush appears to be the likely winner if they can leverage their strengths in crucial parts of the match.