Taylor Townsend vs Louisa Chirico Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W W W L
Form
W L L W W W W L W WH2H: Townsend 3 - 0 Chirico
They have played 6 sets in total, with Townsend winning 6 and Chirico winning 0. The last match between Townsend and Chirico was at the Wimbledon - London, 24-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Taylor Townsend getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Taylor Townsend | 3 |
| Louisa Chirico | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(24-06-2025)
Taylor Townsend
Louisa Chirico
6
4
6
2
| Townsend | Stats | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (10-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (22-19) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 99 | Ranking | 155 |
| 46 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 29 | Age | 29 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 7 |
| 62% (301-186) | Career Total W/L | 56% (343-270) |
| $2,255,139 | Career Prize Money | $649,838 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Taylor Townsend
Player
Louisa Chirico
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Louisa Chirico
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Louisa Chirico
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 36 | Games Won | 15 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:11:0 | Average Match Time | 1:11:0 |
| 72% (114/159) | 1st Serve % | 57% (87/153) |
| 71% (81/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (46/87) |
| 53% (24/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (28/66) |
| 65% (15/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 52% (79/153) | Return Points Win % | 34% (54/159) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Townsend vs Chirico Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Townsend performs better with a second serve, winning 44.16% of points recently, compared to Chirico's 36.8%.
- Return Game: Chirico edges Townsend on returning both first and second serves, with 51.74% and 36.1% compared to Townsend's 48.22% and 30.31%, respectively.
- Under Pressure: Townsend is more adept under pressure, saving 52.03% of breakpoints against Chirico's 42.81%.
- Match Success Rate: In the last year, Townsend has a slightly higher match win rate of 52.78%, while Chirico's is 50.75%.
- Favorite Surface: Both players excel on clay, yet Townsend leads with a 69% win rate compared to Chirico's 61% on this surface.
- Event Level Competition: Townsend has competed more frequently at a higher level, mainly in Masters series, winning 63.64% of these matches, whereas Chirico mostly plays in Challengers/ITF tournaments.
- Direct Encounters: Townsend has a strong record against Chirico with two wins in two matches, including a recent clay court victory.
- Match Duration: The average match duration between them has been 1 hour and 13 minutes.
- Deciding Sets: There have been no prior deciding sets between these two athletes; they have not played any tiebreaks against each other either.
- Opponent Quality: Townsend has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a ranking of 122.83 compared to Chirico's 235.25.
- Deciding Set Performance: Townsend has a 58% success rate in deciding sets over the last year, whereas Chirico's is 50%.
- Break Point Conversion: Chirico has shown greater efficiency in converting breakpoints with a recent rate of 38.81% over Townsend's 30.58%.
Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match features two players with particular strengths and areas of advantage. Taylor Townsend excels in second serve performance and matches under pressure, a clear sign of resilience when the stakes are high. Her experience in superior competition fairs well against Chirico, suggesting a composure in both critical moments and overall match play.
Louisa Chirico, however, has demonstrated stronger return games, which could be pivotal if the match pivots on service breaks. Her proficiency in this area provides a challenging counterpoint to Townsend's gameplay.
Despite Chirico's competence in certain areas, Townsend's prior victories and strategic edge under pressure tips the scale in her favor. Given Townsend’s track record and her overall performance against higher-ranked opponents, she looks well-positioned to secure another win in their head-to-head encounters.
Ultimately, considering the comparative statistics and past outcomes, Taylor Townsend is most likely the favored player to win this event.
Townsend vs Chirico Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Taylor Townsend Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Taylor Townsend
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Hina Inoue
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Louisa Chirico
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Taylor Townsend
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
50
|
2-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
Player
Taylor Townsend
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Taylor Townsend
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Hanna Chang
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
37 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Louisa Chirico
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
3
Total Points Won
5
|
0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Verena Meliss
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Johanne Svendsen
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Louisa Chirico
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (301/186) | Win/Loss | 56% (343/270) |
| 59% (669/463) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (769/650) |
| 54% (5595/4857) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6793/6390) |
| 60% (172/113) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (125/125) |
| 69% (114/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (182/114) |
| 44% (7/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (31/22) |
| 38% (8/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1172 | Aces Total | 921 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 931 | Total Double Faults | 2161 |
| 1:19:43 | Average Match Time | 1:14:27 |
| 436.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 459.67 |
| 67% (18181/27190) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19724/33330) |
| 63% (11521/18181) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (12156/19724) |
| 50% (4464/9009) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (6048/13604) |
| 46% (1505/3276) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1931/4032) |
| 44% (12259/27926) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14709/32459) |
| 51% (39/38) | Slam W/L | 38% (16/26) |
| 61% (52/33) | Masters W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (28/37) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (51/57) |
| 70% (172/75) | Challenger W/L | 60% (250/168) |
| 75% (9/3) | Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) |
| 62% (298/482) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (333/602) |
| 60% (68/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (89/155) |
| 57% (94/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (111/205) |
| 89% (283/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (330/280) |
| 11% (283/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (330/50) |
| 25% (204/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (283/61) |
Townsend vs. Chirico Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
