Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taylor Fritz vs Jeremy Chardy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fritz vs Chardy analysis and find out who is favored!
Taylor Fritz vs Jeremy Chardy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fritz has won 55.48% of points on his second serve, while Chardy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fritz, in recent form, has won 50.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chardy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fritz has saved 67.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chardy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fritz has won 66.15% of matches played (W/L 43/ 22), with Chardy winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fritz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 224/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 32/ 26). Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146).
- Player level: In the last year, Fritz has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 20/ 10), where as Chardy has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fritz winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Fritz winning 2 and Chardy winning 3. The last match between Fritz and Chardy was at the Murray River Open - Melbourne, 05-02-2021, Third, Hard with Jeremy Chardy getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fritz and Chardy have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fritz winning 1 times and Chardy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fritz winning 0, and Chardy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fritz has played against opponents with an average rank of 117.38 while Chardy has played against players with an average rank of 45.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fritz has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chardy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fritz has converted 36.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chardy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fritz 1 - 1 Chardy
15
Rank
5
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
770
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
62% (364-222)
Career Total W/L
54% (494-426)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$9,565,475
Career Prize Money
$5,487,593
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Taylor Fritz | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 21 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:2 | 1:25:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (61/121) | 59% (85/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (43/61) | 76% (65/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (39/60) | 52% (30/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 19% (3/16) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (48/143) | 32% (39/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Taylor Fritz
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
4
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
68%
(
27 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taylor Fritz | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (31/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (254/206) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.79 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 178 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 159.06 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (862/1405) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (647/862) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (297/543) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (56/144) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (576/1505) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Taylor Fritz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Taylor Fritz
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Taylor Fritz
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Taylor Fritz
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Sebastian Baez
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Taylor Fritz
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
8
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Tommy Paul
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Marcos Giron
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Nuno Borges
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fritz Vs Chardy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Taylor Fritz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
